Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for whitnash town council search

Form ID: 75844

Respondent: whitnash town council

Q-I1: Please add any comments you wish to make about the Sustainability Appraisal, indicating clearly which element of the appraisal you are commenting on.

again admirable proposals, but additional development will entensify use of existing services eg health, we need to make sure all our health facilities are improved to take on any increased population such as doctors, dentists, clinics and hospitals etc

Form ID: 75846

Respondent: whitnash town council

Option I3a: Establish a South Warwickshire CIL (or emerging new Infrastructure Levy) to support the delivery of the Plan

selected

Option I3b: Each District Council to produce its own Levy

selected

Form ID: 75848

Respondent: whitnash town council

Q-I4.1: Should we include a policy to safeguard specific infrastructure schemes within the SWLP?

Yes

Q-I4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about these specific safeguarding provisions

No answer given

Form ID: 75851

Respondent: whitnash town council

Option S1a: Identify Strategic Green and Blue Corridors in advance of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy being produced

selected

Option S1b: Do not identify Green and Blue Corridors within the South Warwickshire Local Plan, and instead rely on the production of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy

selected

Form ID: 75853

Respondent: whitnash town council

Option S2a: Identify areas considered particularly suited to intensification development, and develop a design code for each character area. Have a policy supporting intensification within these identified areas where it complies with the relevant design code.

selected

Option S2b: Have a policy with 'in principle' support for intensification development, applicable across South Warwickshire; and develop design codes

selected

Option S2c: Do not have a policy which encourages intensification

selected

Form ID: 75854

Respondent: whitnash town council

Q-S3.1: Please add any comments you wish to make about the Urban Capacity Study

fully agre that future development must take place on brownfield land as a priority

Form ID: 75855

Respondent: whitnash town council

Option S3.2a: Prioritise brownfield development only when it corresponds with the identified growth strategy, or if it can be proven that the development is in a sustainable location or would increase the sustainability of the area.

selected

Option S3.2b: Prioritise development on brownfield land, incorporating existing buildings into development proposals wherever possible, irrespective of its location

selected

Option S3.2c: None of these

selected

Form ID: 75859

Respondent: whitnash town council

Q-S4.1: Do you think that growth of some of our existing settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S4.2: Please add any comments you wish to make about the settlement analysis, indicating clearly which element of the assessment and which settlement(s) you are commenting on

No answer given

Form ID: 75863

Respondent: whitnash town council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Neutral

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Appropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Appropriate strategy

Form ID: 75864

Respondent: whitnash town council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

A higher limit is appropriate

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.