Issue and Options 2023

Back to document

Search form responses

Results for Great Alne Parish Council search

New search

Form ID: 74412

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Q-V3.1: Do you agree that the Vision and Strategic Objectives are appropriate?

Yes

Q-V3.2: If no, please indicate why

No answer given

Form ID: 76099

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Q-H1-1: The HEDNA is proposing that we move away from an approach where future household needs are based on the 2014-based household projections towards a trend-based approach. Do you think that the HEDNA evidence provides a reasonable basis for identifying future levels of housing need across South Warwickshire?

Yes

Q-H1-2: If your answer to H1-1 is No, what would be a more appropriate approach to calculating future housing needs for this Local Plan?

No answer given

Form ID: 77739

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Q-H2-1: What is the best way to significantly increase the supply of affordable housing across South Warwickshire?

Use the HEDNA evidence to arrive at targets for delivery of affordable homes, numbers, type of tenure, etc.. Set design standards so that developers know the specifications required for elements such as thermal efficiency, open space, gardens, etc. If developers can't be persuaded to build enough suitable homes, councils should consider becoming developers themselves.

Option H2-2a: A single South Warwickshire wide affordable housing requirement

selected

Option H2-2b: Separate affordable housing requirements for Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick Districts

selected

Option H2-2c: A more localised approach with separate affordable housing requirements for different localities across South Warwickshire

selected

Q-H2-3: How should South Warwickshire best address the specialist needs for older people?

No answer given

Form ID: 77748

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Option H3a: Do not seek to include minimum space standards in a policy in the SWLP.

selected

Option H3b: Apply Nationally Described Space Standards to developments across South Warwickshire based on locally derived evidence.

selected

Option H3c: Include a requirement to meet optional Building Regulations M4(2)/M4(3) as standard. These are focussed upon ensuring appropriate accessibility standards.

selected

Option H3d: None of these

selected

Form ID: 77768

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Option H5a: Identify a range of specific sites within or on the edge of existing settlements of approximately 5-20 homes in size to be developed only for self and custom build homes.

selected

Option H5b: Require large developments of, say, over 100 homes to provide a proportion of self and custom-build homes within the overall site.

selected

Option H5c: Rely on a case-by-case approach whereby planning applications for self and custom build homes will be assessed against a range of criteria to determine their suitability.

selected

Form ID: 77774

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Option H6a: Identify a range of specific sites in sustainable locations of up to 15 pitches/plots in size to be developed only for Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes.

selected

Option H6b: Require large developments of over 500 homes to provide a proportion of Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes on the edge of the overall site.

selected

Option H6c: Rely on a case-by-case approach whereby planning applications for Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showpeople homes will be assessed against a range of criteria to determine their suitability.

selected

Q-H7: Please add any comments you wish to make about delivering homes in South Warwickshire

No answer given

Form ID: 77798

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

No answer given

Form ID: 77869

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Appropriate strategy

Option 3: Economy

Appropriate strategy

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Inappropriate strategy

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

Form ID: 77870

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Limit of 10 dwellings per site

Form ID: 77873

Respondent: Great Alne Parish Council

Option S9a: Save all existing settlement boundaries where these are already defined within the Core Strategy, Local Plan, emerging SAP or an NDP.

selected

Option S9b: Within this Part 1 Plan, review which settlements have boundaries defined and which do not, as well as the extent of any such boundaries.

selected

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.