Issue and Options 2023

Search form responses

Results for Ettington Parish Council search

Form ID: 77893

Respondent: Ettington Parish Council

Q-H2-1: What is the best way to significantly increase the supply of affordable housing across South Warwickshire?

The housing plan should take into account, local housing needs survey data. Where no data exists, surveys should be undertaken prior to approving planning in smaller settlements. It is particularly true of villages that land prices are higher since property values are higher. However, limiting developments so that smaller, low cost houses are placed in more spacious plots reduces the revenue that can be achieved from a particular plot which then affects the land price. Placing a covenant on these developments to prevent significant enlargement planning permissions later then keeps these properties smaller and more affordable in perpetuity. The price of building land is very much a function of how much revenue developers can generate so it is a fallacy to say that they must build larger homes to justify the price of the land. Planning in villages should encourage low cost homes so that young people can remain in the communities they grew up in or move to villages keeping the communities alive with new children. They should also supply and maintain small low cost homes suitable for retirement properties.

Option H2-2a: A single South Warwickshire wide affordable housing requirement

selected

Option H2-2b: Separate affordable housing requirements for Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick Districts

selected

Option H2-2c: A more localised approach with separate affordable housing requirements for different localities across South Warwickshire

selected

Q-H2-3: How should South Warwickshire best address the specialist needs for older people?

No answer given

Form ID: 77894

Respondent: Ettington Parish Council

Option 1: Rail Corridors

Appropriate strategy

Option 2: Sustainable Travel

Neutral

Option 3: Economy

Neutral

Option 4: Sustainable Travel and Economy

Neutral

Option 5: Dispersed

Inappropriate strategy

Form ID: 77895

Respondent: Ettington Parish Council

Option T1a: Include no policy on the principles of the 20-minute neighbourhood for new development.

selected

Option T1b: Include reference to the principles of a 20-minute neighbourhood or other similar design approach (e.g. Building for a Healthy Life) within a broader overarching policy.

selected

Option T1c: Include a bespoke policy requiring the principles of 20-minute neighbourhoods to be included within development proposals.

selected

Form ID: 77896

Respondent: Ettington Parish Council

Q-S8.1: For settlements falling outside the chosen growth strategy, do you think a threshold approach is appropriate, to allow more small-scale developments to come forward?

Yes

Q-S8.2: For sites coming forward as part of this threshold approach, what do you think would be an appropriate size limit for individual sites?

Limit of 10 dwellings per site

Form ID: 77897

Respondent: Ettington Parish Council

Option B3a: Introduce Special Landscape Areas across all of South Warwickshire

selected

Option B3b: Maintain Special landscape Areas within Stratford-on-Avon District but don't introduce them within Warwick District

selected

Option B3c: Discard Special Landscape Areas and bolster general landscape policy

selected

Form ID: 77898

Respondent: Ettington Parish Council

Option B4a: Maintain the current policy approach, without the use of a buffer

selected

Option B4b: Amend the current policy and include a buffer around the periphery of the Cotswold AONB to ensure that great weight is given to any impacts development within this buffer zone may have on the National Landscape

selected

Form ID: 77899

Respondent: Ettington Parish Council

Q-P1.3: Do you agree with the selection of policies to be addressed in the Part 1 plan?

Yes

Q-P1.4: If not, please indicate why

No answer given

Form ID: 77900

Respondent: Ettington Parish Council

Q-B2: Should the Policy on the Vale of Evesham Control Zone be removed, if neighbouring authorities decide not to carry the designation forward?

Form ID: 77901

Respondent: Ettington Parish Council

Q-S5.2: Do you think new settlements should be part of the overall strategy?

Yes

Q-S5.3: In response to the climate change emergencies, we are looking at rail corridors as a preferred approach to identifying potential locations. Do you agree?

Yes

Q-S5.4: If not, what approach would you take?

No answer given

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.