Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission
Search representations
Results for A C Lloyd Homes search
New searchObject
Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission
6.0 Neighbourhood Plan Policies
Representation ID: 72001
Received: 18/08/2020
Respondent: A C Lloyd Homes
Agent: Delta Planning
Policy Map 1 needs to be updated to outline the major housing commitments in Radford Semele such as A C Lloyd's permission for 65 dwellings at Spring Lane which is currently under construction (permission ref: W/14/0433 & W/15/2129).
Please see attached.
Object
Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission
RS6 - Conserving and Enhancing Radford Semele's Landscape Character
Representation ID: 72002
Received: 18/08/2020
Respondent: A C Lloyd Homes
Agent: Delta Planning
Policy RS6 should be omitted.
Policy RS6 (f) seeks to protect the essential character and quality of a number of views within the Parish. We object to the proposed Community Valued View RS6/5 (view from footpath south of new Spring Lane development).
It is considered that this policy is not supported by a robust evidence base. Appendix 3 of the Neighbourhood Plan includes a short description of each view and why they are considered to be important. The reasoning for RS6/5 is as follows: “View of tranquil, open countryside towards the brook. with the Copse closer to the viewpoint. In Spring and Summer, birds of prey often bring up their young, giving spectacular displays to the many who use the footpath (W121)”.
It is noted that Policy RS6 is not supported by Warwick District Council in the Consultation Statement (April 2020) published alongside the Neighbourhood Plan.
Please see attached.
Object
Radford Semele Neighbourhood Plan - Regulation 16 Submission
RS12 - Area of Separation
Representation ID: 72003
Received: 18/08/2020
Respondent: A C Lloyd Homes
Agent: Delta Planning
We object to the proposed Area of Separation under draft Policy RS12 as it is considered that land immediately south of A C Lloyds’ residential development situated off Spring Lane should not be included within the proposed area of separation.
Please see attached.