No

Representation ID: 93315

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Cllr David Armstrong

This area covers some of the only Green Belt between Kenilworth, Burton Green and Coventry. If the residential elements of the site were built on, the knock-on transport needs would imply a new road, as the consultation text states, which would further erode this separation. The phase 1 Green Belt review identified this region as contributing strongly. The University of Warwick has plans for an Eco Park in this area, which would be cut in two by any A46 link road, meaning further indirect negative effects. The new NPPF housing numbers for Coventry are substantially reduced, reducing any overspill requirement.

No

Representation ID: 93545

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Christine Thornton

The site is close to Oakley Wood, a historic iron age fort and also to Ashorne and Newbold Pacey which are conservation villages. It occupies prime agricultural land and links up with Leamington Spa without green spaces. Traffic congestion is already very bad and the local schools and medical facilities are totally inadequate for such development,. Public transport in the area is almost non existent and therefore there will be more cars on the roads which are not suitable for heavier use. Currently this is a peaceful part of rural Warwickshire with so many valuable historical links.

Yes

Representation ID: 93584

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Bennett

Proximity to Coventry makes this site extremely suitable to provide the additional homes needed by the population of the City of Coventry and is well supported by the existing infrastructure with the A45 and railway stations at Canley and Tile Hill.

No

Representation ID: 93632

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Stevenson

The majority of SG01 is covered by Warwick University and extends into Coventry. The Warwick University area will not be available for housing. A large section of the remainder of SG01 is currently Green Belt and should score poorly on that basis - the existing Green Belt land is good quality farming land.
The location of SG01 appears to serve Coventry rather than South Warwickshire. A large driver for accommodation in this area derives from student use, and that has been catered for within Coventry by the creation of 4000+ rooms in purpose built blocks just within the Coventry border

No

Representation ID: 93737

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr William Campbell

The area is already over developed and the loss of further green belt land would damage the balance of nature.
The road networks are already over capacity and social facilities under stress.

No

Representation ID: 93767

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Warwick District Green Party

The development of this area will in effect remove the last strand of greenbelt between Coventry and Burton Green / Kenilworth. As the government has removed the urban uplift in housing numbers, Coventry is likely to meet its housing needs within its own boundaries without further need to cooperate making this area even less attractive. The University of Warwick is planning an Eco Park on their portion of this land. Connecting this up with the existing areas of woodland on the site into new habitats to enhance nature would both increase biodiversity and ensure the essential greenbelt corridor remains.

Yes

Representation ID: 93872

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Brown

Stonleigh park is a Brown Field site that has the opportunity for growth in a sustainable manner. It has good access to major road systems and is bordered by hs2 crating a natural limitation to over development

Yes

Representation ID: 93884

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Brown

Sg01 offers a way to deliver land for many new houses in a way that is limited by a46 and hs2 that is linked to nearby major road networks

No

Representation ID: 93914

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Miss A HEBDEN

I WANT TO LIVE IN A VILLAGE NOT IN COVENTRY'S SHADOW.
I WANT TO LIVE WHERE IT GOES DARK AT NIGHT NOT AN ILLUMINATED NOISY BLACKPOOL.
NO DOCTORS APPOINTMENTS AVAILABLE, NO SPACE IN SCHOOLS. NO POLICING.
WE SUFFER CONTINUOUS SPEEDING, JOY RIDERS, EXCESSIVE POLLUTION.
THIS IS GREEN BELT LAND AND SHOULD REMAIN SO.
WHY ARE YOU SO DETERMINED TO BUILD ON EVERY PARCEL OF GREEN SPACE? WHEN WILL YOU REALISE THAT THERE WILL BE NO ECO SYSTEM, WILDLIFE, FUTURE FOR OUR CHILDREN IF YOU CONTINUE TO BE SO SHORT SIGHTED?
I VEHEMENTLY OPPOSED THESE PROPOSALS FOR SG01.

No

Representation ID: 94152

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Anne Green

Inappropriate development in the Green Belt

Yes

Representation ID: 94204

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Andrew Close

Given HS2 will mark a significant change in context to this part of SW, this location is, in reality, part of Coventry. HS2 forms a spatial boundary and the townscape chararcter alters. Development potential should be maximised; however how would a strategic allocation fit with the recently adopted Warwick Univ SPD?

No

Representation ID: 94206

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: mr william tansey

The proximity of this proposal to the urban borders of Coventry and Kenilworth in such a small gap would lead to the conurbation of this area. This area contributes significantly to all 5 stated purposed of greenbelt particularly in restricting urban sprawl and in preventing the neighbouring towns merging; or in this case a city swallowing a town. Both Kenilworth and Coventry and Historic and despite modern edge of town developments, deserve to maintain their individual identities.

No

Representation ID: 94402

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Belinda Brown

This would involve the University's agricultural land being taken out of the greenbelt protection, all the way up to HS2. HS2 promises were made about the creation of 'green corridors' that mitigate habitat loss - developing SG01 with up to 4600 homes directly contradicts this and represents inappropriate development in the greenbelt. There is also insufficient road capacity and traffic and highways would not be able to cope with the volume of additional traffic.

Yes

Representation ID: 94416

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Heidi Ambrose-Brown

Good links to university campus. Already established R&D businesses in that area - good employment opportunities.
Already good links to road network and bus links to Coventry Station.
Would encourage high quality growth and business opportunities.

Yes

Representation ID: 94648

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Hammond

.

Other

Representation ID: 94699

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Jackson

N/A

Other

Representation ID: 94709

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

we have insufficient knowledge of this location from which to make an informed comment

Yes

Representation ID: 94759

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Clarke

Makes sense to locate in an area where HS2 has already impacted upon the rural nature of land in the location.

No

Representation ID: 94852

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Deborah Barleggs

This proposed area for redesignating seems huge. The size of a small town. Residents have already been so disrupted by HS2 developments, to now turn this into an enormous housing estate is incredulous. Surely there is existing properties or areas in Coventry that would benefit from regeneration? And where people could use existing public transport infrastructure, commercial and retail.

No

Representation ID: 94855

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Philip Barleggs

This site is outrageously large and developing a site of this size would likely be more destructive than constructive. It would surely be better to redevelop the existing infrastructure within Coventry's confines than to expand its boundaries to the point where it effectively merges with Kenilworth, which itself will almost be merged with Warwick/Leamington Spa. I completely disagree with there being a strong enough need for such evident urban sprawl.

Yes

Representation ID: 94861

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Chilton

This area already has the transport links

No

Representation ID: 94868

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jeremy Kenney-herbert

The development area proposed would cause Burton Green to lose its village character with loss of separation from Coventry.
There is already significant housing development ongoing nearby and no new health or education infrastructure. There's a lack of recreational infrastructure.
The loss of woodland and encroaching development would have significant impact on local wildlife and biodiversity.
The area should never have been included in the local plan and should be returned to the Green Belt; it includes the University of Warwick where clearly no houses will be built.
Leisure activity; public footpath use is already compromised by HS2 & development.

Yes

Representation ID: 95109

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Chilton

The infrastructure is already there re transport links

No

Representation ID: 95158

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jane Kenney-Herbert

The area of proposed development will be hugely detrimental to the character of Burton Green as it will be absorbed into Coventry. There is no new health and education infrastructure with regard to housing being built now.
There is a lack of recreational infrastructure. Yet more loss of woodland will have a marked effect on wildlife and biodiversity.
The area should be returned immediately to the Green Belt. ; it inlcudes Warwick University where clearly no houses will be built. Leisure and exercise facilities are already severely curtailed by HS2 and further development

No

Representation ID: 95324

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Patricia Holliday

Burton Green has already been decimated by HS2, if this proposed growth plan goes ahead there will be very little if any green belt left between Burton Green and Kenilworth.

No

Representation ID: 95395

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs R Douce

It is essential that what is left of the green belt between Kenilworth and Coventry is preserved. The role of the green belt in preventing urban sprawl and allowing built up areas to maintain their settings and special character is particularly relevant here. This area of green belt needs to be preserved for agriculture and leisure use and to maintain valuable areas of ecology and diversity.

No

Representation ID: 95407

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Dr William Mack

If Green Belt must be developed (and the test for exceptional circumstances is not in fact met, given the number of locations identified in the interim appraisal), this land has already been compromised by HS2, and has excellent transport links, and proximity to a major employer (the University of Warwick) with the services available on Campus to make it reasonably sustainable.

Yes

Representation ID: 95408

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Hannah Molloy

Coventry housing allocation should be located around Coventry. Better for sustainability, reduce car use, closer to industirial, commercial and retail Coventry

No

Representation ID: 95498

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Dave Maxted

I believe that the current housing developments sprouting up all around Kenilworth, together with the planned development of two ex-school sites and others lined up are more than enough for our town.
These developments are already straining local facilities like surgeries, schools, car parks. New households will inevitably create more traffic in and around the town, as they will not be self-sufficient in terms of entertainment places, shops, cafes, pubs etc.
Even with the current developments there is a lack of connecting infrastructure - cycleways, footpaths, forcing more people into cars to access the town. Enough is enough.

Yes

Representation ID: 95502

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Dave Maxted

This site is preferable to those proposed for agricultural area designated as green belt