No

Representation ID: 87971

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Jo Meakin

Inappropriate use of green belt. Area already impacted by HS2

Yes

Representation ID: 87974

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

Yes due to being on the edge of an urban area with good existing infrastructure due to be on the edge of a city centre

Yes

Representation ID: 87977

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Quantrill

Yes as its on the edge of an urban area with good existing infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 88061

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs vivien bryer

Could provide a lot of student accommodation, freeing up housing in nearby towns. Would be more environmentally friendly as they would not have to travel, and they would probably enjoy living nearer to the uni.

No

Representation ID: 88063

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jeanette Ray

This looks like green belt land .
The infrastructure of kenilworth is not sufficient to carter for more houses .
Roads are not adequate to cope with more traffic

Yes

Representation ID: 88130

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anne Parry

Support in view of its sustainable location and connectivity to existing road and rail infrastructure, education and health provision.

Yes

Representation ID: 88161

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rozanne Harris

SG01 is either already in or directly adjacent to a highly populated area. The road infrastructure is already in place

Yes

Representation ID: 88226

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Excellent sensible location to not only create and expand an innovation and technology hub of new businesses, close access to Warwick University with improving road infrastructure and good access for north and south of UK. Ideal for housing, affordable and student. This is ideal for Coventry. Coventry should be a city where the UK should seek to regenerate - urban regeneration and improve the city.

No

Representation ID: 88314

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Philip Browne

This will destroy green belt between Coventry and Kenilworth and effectively conjoin them. This is contrary to one of the key roles of green belt.

No

Representation ID: 88532

Received: 16/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Kathryn Lawry Kennedy

It's important to keep a clear distance between Coventry and Kenilworth.

Yes

Representation ID: 88614

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Jerry Corless

Close to current employment areas.

No

Representation ID: 88627

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Laura Grive

This is an egregious proposal . In the last few years we have seen an enormous amount of housing estates popping up
and filling the land between Shipston and Chipping Campden . And also in Shipston on the London Road . Surely these sites have already fulfilled the need for extra housing ? With a proposal this vast getting in and out of Shipston, an historic and ancient market town, will become impossible

No

Representation ID: 88677

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Gillian Browne

I object to SG01 on the grounds that it is green belt land and one of the purposes of green belt land, as per the government's own guidelines, it that it should be used to provide a gap between conurbations. Building on this land will remove the space between Coventry and Kenilworth.
The new build houses that have currently been built in Kenilworth have not been sold implying there is less demand for houses in Kenilworth. The site of the old school has not been built on yet either.
The local transport provision and hospitals are also at capacity.

Other

Representation ID: 88678

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Crispin Passmore

Broadly yes but I'd need to better understand what is envisaged here. Hopefully a mix of expansion of university, housing and local employment. Then I would support it.

No

Representation ID: 88693

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Philip Browne

SG01 is an area of green land which lies in between Coventry and Kenilworth. One of the principal values of green belt land is to provide space between cities, towns, and villages. Developing SG01 will effectively remove any divisions between two urban areas, destroying habitats and depriving residents easy access to green spaces. If this government want healthier citizens they might reflect on the health benefits access to green spaces confers. I wasn't surprised to see the Tories whack a train track through green space. As a life long Labour voter I'll be crushed to see you follow suit.

No

Representation ID: 88781

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Roopa Lentini

Ruin rural landscape and cause bottlenecks to infrastructure

No

Representation ID: 88784

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Dean Lentini

Building new houses in north Leamington is not only going to cause more traffic than we already have and the infrastructure won’t handle it. But more disappointingly it will ruin the countryside we have and that up market feel. Look at Warwick gates development it’s ruined and the traffic is colossal and the place looks like a tip. Leamington has been ruined enough without you building more trash in the best part of leamington.

Yes

Representation ID: 88878

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Helena Flisowski

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 89023

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sara Bird

Near to existing infrastructure, facilities and sustainable transport

No

Representation ID: 89355

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs C Hollis

SG01 is mostly Green Belt and is good quality agricultural land which has been inappropriately assessed.
SG01 is much too small to meet the requirements for sustainable development and this location does not service South Warwickshire.
There is no planned and budgeted infrastructure (schools, healthcare, roads etc) to support this development.
There are developments within Solihull that should be considered alongside.

No

Representation ID: 89429

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Brooks

I believe that the Green Belt land included in this section of the map should be excluded for development.

No

Representation ID: 89440

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Brooks

We have little enough Green Belt areas as it is and building more housing on green sites only exaserbates the problem.

No

Representation ID: 89511

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Emily Carleton

This is mostly green belt land! There is also a beautiful nature reserve called Tocil Wood! Please do not build on this land. I once saw a very beautiful dragonfly there and it is teeming with nature.

No

Representation ID: 89604

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Stella Moore

There is already enough development and HS2mayhem in this zone. Enough is enough

No

Representation ID: 89618

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Robert Smith

Hatton Park has already created a blotch on the landscape that side of Warwick - this is greenbelt land and is creating the sprawl of Warwick town into the countryside.

Yes

Representation ID: 89619

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Robert Smith

This is an obvious choice for growth, however in greenbelt land and an obvious merging of Coventry and Kenilworth - this surely goes against NPPF for use of greenbelt land.

No

Representation ID: 89662

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

I think it is important to maintain a clear green space between the conurbations of Kenilworth and Coventry, to help retain the distinctive small town feeling of Kenilworth

Yes

Representation ID: 89710

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Dodd

I think the South of Coventry Group is a good idea in order to expand the housing stock in a sensible way as it would be well connected by bus routes and other forms of sustainable transport. The only concern that I would have about is the amount of woodland and whether this would be damaged by development near the site either for housing or employment.

Yes

Representation ID: 89723

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Compton Verney

n/a

Yes

Representation ID: 89981

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Kulbir Birak

Is able to take advantage of existing infrastructure (major roads, developed shopping for large populations etc).