No

Representation ID: 90078

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Catherine Hewson

Broadwells Wood and Black Waste Wood Local Wildlife Site (LWS) and Wainbody and Kenilworth Road Woods LWS, Kenilworth Common LWS and River Sowe & Finham Brook & lakes

Yes

Representation ID: 90132

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Oliver Ashford

Close to already built up area and amenaties

Yes

Representation ID: 90279

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Liz Stone

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 90377

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Jayne Jones

I previously lived in this area for nearly 30 years, and know the infrastructure exists to support this.

Yes

Representation ID: 90398

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Louise Stewart

Adds to existing well established infrastructure and as a large town, it already provides employment with significant further opportunity for expansion. Business owners do not want to come to a brand new site with no facilities, it is too risky for them in an already challenging economy.

No

Representation ID: 90621

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James Kennedy

The development of this area will in effect remove the last strand of greenbelt between Coventry and Burton Green / Kenilworth. The greenbelt has already been severely damaged and curtailed by the construction of HS2, and any further reduction in the area will mean that Kenilworth becomes a suburb of Coventry. The University of Warwick is planning an Eco Park on their portion of this land. Connecting this up with the existing areas of woodland on the site into new habitats to enhance nature would both increase biodiversity and ensure the essential greenbelt corridor between Coventry and Kenilworth remains.

No

Representation ID: 90671

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sue Elkins

This area is not being appropriately assessed, is mostly in Green Belt and should not be considered as part of the Strategic Growth Plan. The current weighting of 6% appears very low and not an effective well performing area of Green Belt.
This area comprises of good quality agricultural land and the value this plays should play a bigger part in the assessment. The wider economic issues means we should not be removing land which we use to grow our food locally. Avoiding this category of land for housing development is advised in the National Planning Framework.
Lack of infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 90679

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Averil Stewart

makes better sense to use land already supporting housing with ready made facilities, shops and infrastructure than manu of the small villages already struggling for these

Yes

Representation ID: 90760

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr N Ledger

Worthy of more detailed consideration

Yes

Representation ID: 90998

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree. Logical location and very much want to see Coventry re-urbanised and developed to make Coventry a great place to live and work. Work should be done on re-urbanising run down areas to stimulate investment, growth and job opportunities and safe places to live

Other

Representation ID: 91109

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs liz jackson

yes, to the extent not within the greenbelt or other protected area

Yes

Representation ID: 91198

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

-

No

Representation ID: 91416

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

The proposal will impact upon the following important Local Wildlife Sites: Broadwells Wood and Black Waste Wood Local Wildlife Site (LWS) and Wainbody and Kenilworth Road Woods LWS, Kenilworth Common LWS and River Sowe & Finham Brook & lakes

Yes

Representation ID: 91487

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Beth Palmer

I believe there is more scope for development in this area without scarring the countryside whilst good transport links are more easily accessible

No

Representation ID: 91735

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms miranda maloney

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 91908

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Bernard Davis

This area provides the biggest residential capacity in Coventry & Kenilworth.
It is close to major employment centres at Warwick University and Coventry
It is 3.6 times larger than SG04 (land South of Kenilworth).
The northern portion is outside the green belt.
It has significant existing infrastructure.
HS2 has already damaged green belt, reducing value and attractiveness in this area.

Yes

Representation ID: 91923

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James OShea

This is a suitable and sustainable location which has the relevant infrastructure to work with

Yes

Representation ID: 92121

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Ted and Zbigniew Jasinski

Provides the biggest residential capacity in Coventry and Kenilworth.
Provides approximately 3 times the capacity of SG04.
Northern portion is outside green belt.
There is a significant existing infrastructure.
HS2 has already damaged green belt reducing attractiveness in the area
Close to major employment centres at Warwick University and Coventry.

No

Representation ID: 92196

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Laura Gibb

Too much and too big a development, starting to join Kenilworth to Coventry. They are SEPARATE. There should be NO development on the Kenilworth side of HS2. Traffic in this area is already congested and road infrastructure is not suited to further vast increases in traffic.

Yes

Representation ID: 92288

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Harbury Parish Council

Yes this is an appropriate location, given the proximity to Coventry, and the University of Warwick.

Yes

Representation ID: 92884

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ed Molloy

We should preserve Green belt.

We are aware that South Warwickshire is bounded by Coventry and Redditch and there may be unmet needs from those areas that have to be accommodated. However, it is clear from comments on this matter in the previous inspector's Report (2017), that development to meet the unmet needs of Coventry will need to be located adjoining Coventry, rather than the edge of Leamington and other villages. The same principle would apply to Redditch.

Better for transport and sustainability

Yes

Representation ID: 93014

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Nichole South

Room for development, strategic growth. Rail and road already in place.

Yes

Representation ID: 93057

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Cathy Kennedy

It seems a logical place to grow.

Yes

Representation ID: 93094

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Waters

Good motorway (M40/A46, M6, M69 etc) and close-by rail link

No

Representation ID: 93110

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Christine Orton

Kenilworth will be a suburb of Coventry, especially as land off Beehive Hill and Hollis Lane is already at risk of development. Loss of green space around Hollis Lane, Cryfield Grange Road and Crackley Lane.

Yes

Representation ID: 93127

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jon Redhead

The area of SG01 has many plusses for residential capacity development, in that the employment sectors are so near, with far easier transport links to the road network. The northern portion lies outside Green belt, and HS2 has already carved a noisy corridor through existing Green belt which can be somewhat regenerated along with new infrastructure build to mitigate impact. The total area of this land is more than 3 times larger than SG04, and will more than satisfy the strategic growth requirements between Kenilworth and Coventry. This land could be considered in part, retaining some areas of Green belt.

Yes

Representation ID: 93131

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Jean Nixon

This site includes Warwick University land. Already lots of development in this area and as the councils are in favour of developing land for the university it seems lots of damage has already been done to this area. There must be some brownfield site within SG01. The University is a large employer and to add additional development to the area is probably less destructive to the green belt than creating a new site.

No

Representation ID: 93179

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jean Gill

The area is mainly green belt land (and what has been withdrawn from green belt shouldn’t have been) and is good quality agricultural land that should be used for food production. It does not score well as a sustainable development option using council methodology and SG01 is much smaller than it seems given that a good proportion of it is in the University of Warwick site giving zero housing. A lack of infrastructure is identified by the Sustainability Assesment, our roads cannot cope with more population nor can our schools or health care facilities. The area has suffered enough development.

No

Representation ID: 93183

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Michael Gill

High harm, low sustainability scoring compared to other options.
The green belt has been inappropriately assessed, performs well and should not be considered for housing as is quality agricultural land needed for local food production and UK self sufficiency.
Insufficient infrastructure (schools, roads/ primary care planned, insufficient budget. Previously assessed as unsuitable for housing.
No consideration to very close large Solihull developments over 1000 houses also assessed as high performing green belt.
Solihull, Coventry & Warwick have overestimated the number of houses needed for for the region.

Yes

Representation ID: 93308

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Warwick District Council

Most suitable area in WDC area, and can meet the need for Coventry overspill.