Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3006
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill
Leave nature alone before this planet is destroyed.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3018
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Bill McCutchon
The loss of such a substantial amount of Green Belt and the closing of the gap between Coventry and Kenilworth, thus destroying the environment both for people living in Finham and Green Lane as well as people living in Kenilworth. The loss of wildlife habitat and fertile farmland.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3109
Received: 17/09/2000
Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3127
Received: 18/09/2009
Respondent: Mel Gillman
The proposed option is a drastic change from the current situation as there is substantial loss of the green belt to the south of Leamington and Warick around Europa Way and Bishops Tachbrook. This will not enhance the lives of current residents or visitors to the district as the area will be over developed.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3184
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: John Murphy
YES - but should be amended to reflect the more balanced spread (four towns and south of Coventry) of development which we suggest earlier in this questionnaire.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3241
Received: 20/09/2009
Respondent: mrs stella moore
If this was applied to the proposed developments in kenilworth then they would not hold up unless much thought is given to flora and fauna and how to protect it.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3295
Received: 20/09/2009
Respondent: Mr David John Bowers
I do not wish to see anymore houses and factories built on farm land and green belt sites.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3349
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp
The proposed housing developments represent an assault on the natural environment
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3416
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs M Kane
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3465
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mr P Dimanbro
Failure to consider the impact of Global warming. Climate change will alter the basis for decision making
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3492
Received: 18/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs E. Appleby
Kings Hill Lane should be included in the 'preferred options' as it is a 'unique special landscape area'.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3537
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: R.F. Garner
Warwick Gates to Bishops Tachbrook essentially rural in character which would be destroyed by building houses.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3542
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: R.F. Garner
Green field land of high quality should not be squandered. Future generations will need land suitable for food production. Effort should be put into finding more brown field land or identifying sites of lower agricultural value
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3587
Received: 16/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Owen
object
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3612
Received: 08/09/2009
Respondent: Robin and Anne Tole
Land is green belt and productive farmland. In highly built up area is important to retain.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3614
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: Sport England
The LPA should considor the role of Sport in the natural environment. The district is rich with opportunities which should be carefully managed to accommodate the wider community's interests and requirements, not just conservationists and ramblers.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3621
Received: 07/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs D H Cowgill
Good agricultural land needed. South of Sydnenham site and east of Whitnash is next to Whitnash Brook Valley Nature reserve with wildlife in evidence.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3624
Received: 07/09/2009
Respondent: Mr C K Mason
Loss of farmland and habitats.Only narrow strip of green belt would divide new settlement from Bishops Tachbrook and poisitive socio economic diversity in council's vision could be lost.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3681
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Stephen Keay
Green belt/productive agricultural land need s to be retained. Giving it up to unnecessary developmet will damage the area in the long term.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3723
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes
No.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3747
Received: 13/08/2009
Respondent: Alan N Gandy
Green Belt and Conservation Areas can be ridden over and no protection offered from questionable developments. Keeping significant green buffer between Whitnash and Bishops Tachbrook has little value when current green buffer under attack.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3763
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3764
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3765
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3784
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Carol Pritchard
Acknowledged constraints: scheduled ancient monument, regionally important geological site, flood risk zones, undulating land, noise from A46 and railway line, impact on area of medium and high landscape value.
Kings Hill historic area with links to Stoneleigh Abbey: ancient hedgerows, diverse wildlife.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3793
Received: 21/09/2009
Respondent: Roger Morrall
Loss of green belt, prime farming land, risk of flooding.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3798
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Veda Morrall
Loss of green belt and prime farming land with significant effect on wildlife.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3804
Received: 18/09/2009
Respondent: Angela Murray
It will destroy farmland currently used to produce food crops.
It will destroy wildlife habitats - badger setts on Kings Hill
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3808
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Mrs Pat Weake
Loss of green belt south of Harbury Lane.
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 3825
Received: 04/08/2009
Respondent: Patricia and William Smith
Serious concern over Kings Hill site:
Productive farmland
Stoneleigh and other villages in danger of losing character.
Erosion of gap between Coventry, Kenilworth and Leamington.
Bore hole at Green Lane/Gretna Road junction for water extraction - becoming increasingly valuable.
Kings Hill Lane prone to surface water and flooding
Finham sewage works adjacent with resulting smells, especially in summer.
Building would to close to long, elevated section of A46 with resulting noise and air pollution
Proximity to flight path for Coventry airport with resulting air pollution
Massive amount of buildings needed in addition to houses resulting in more loss of green belt
Could result in Coventry becoming 'supercity' through absorption of villages - Kenilworth, Bubbenhall, Stoneleigh and Baginton
Wrong to allocate green belt land to accommodate unnecessary housing.