Showing comments and forms 61 to 90 of 1396

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3006

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Representation Summary:

Leave nature alone before this planet is destroyed.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3018

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Bill McCutchon

Representation Summary:

The loss of such a substantial amount of Green Belt and the closing of the gap between Coventry and Kenilworth, thus destroying the environment both for people living in Finham and Green Lane as well as people living in Kenilworth. The loss of wildlife habitat and fertile farmland.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3109

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3127

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mel Gillman

Representation Summary:

The proposed option is a drastic change from the current situation as there is substantial loss of the green belt to the south of Leamington and Warick around Europa Way and Bishops Tachbrook. This will not enhance the lives of current residents or visitors to the district as the area will be over developed.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3184

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

Representation Summary:

YES - but should be amended to reflect the more balanced spread (four towns and south of Coventry) of development which we suggest earlier in this questionnaire.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3241

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

Representation Summary:

If this was applied to the proposed developments in kenilworth then they would not hold up unless much thought is given to flora and fauna and how to protect it.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3295

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

Representation Summary:

I do not wish to see anymore houses and factories built on farm land and green belt sites.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3349

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Representation Summary:

The proposed housing developments represent an assault on the natural environment

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3416

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3465

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr P Dimanbro

Representation Summary:

Failure to consider the impact of Global warming. Climate change will alter the basis for decision making

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3492

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs E. Appleby

Representation Summary:

Kings Hill Lane should be included in the 'preferred options' as it is a 'unique special landscape area'.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3537

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: R.F. Garner

Representation Summary:

Warwick Gates to Bishops Tachbrook essentially rural in character which would be destroyed by building houses.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3542

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: R.F. Garner

Representation Summary:

Green field land of high quality should not be squandered. Future generations will need land suitable for food production. Effort should be put into finding more brown field land or identifying sites of lower agricultural value

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3587

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

Representation Summary:

object

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3612

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Robin and Anne Tole

Representation Summary:

Land is green belt and productive farmland. In highly built up area is important to retain.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3614

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Sport England

Representation Summary:

The LPA should considor the role of Sport in the natural environment. The district is rich with opportunities which should be carefully managed to accommodate the wider community's interests and requirements, not just conservationists and ramblers.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3621

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs D H Cowgill

Representation Summary:

Good agricultural land needed. South of Sydnenham site and east of Whitnash is next to Whitnash Brook Valley Nature reserve with wildlife in evidence.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3624

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr C K Mason

Representation Summary:

Loss of farmland and habitats.Only narrow strip of green belt would divide new settlement from Bishops Tachbrook and poisitive socio economic diversity in council's vision could be lost.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3681

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Keay

Representation Summary:

Green belt/productive agricultural land need s to be retained. Giving it up to unnecessary developmet will damage the area in the long term.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3723

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Representation Summary:

No.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3747

Received: 13/08/2009

Respondent: Alan N Gandy

Representation Summary:

Green Belt and Conservation Areas can be ridden over and no protection offered from questionable developments. Keeping significant green buffer between Whitnash and Bishops Tachbrook has little value when current green buffer under attack.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3763

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3764

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3765

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3784

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Carol Pritchard

Representation Summary:

Acknowledged constraints: scheduled ancient monument, regionally important geological site, flood risk zones, undulating land, noise from A46 and railway line, impact on area of medium and high landscape value.
Kings Hill historic area with links to Stoneleigh Abbey: ancient hedgerows, diverse wildlife.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3793

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Morrall

Representation Summary:

Loss of green belt, prime farming land, risk of flooding.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3798

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Veda Morrall

Representation Summary:

Loss of green belt and prime farming land with significant effect on wildlife.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3804

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Angela Murray

Representation Summary:

It will destroy farmland currently used to produce food crops.
It will destroy wildlife habitats - badger setts on Kings Hill

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3808

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pat Weake

Representation Summary:

Loss of green belt south of Harbury Lane.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 3825

Received: 04/08/2009

Respondent: Patricia and William Smith

Representation Summary:

Serious concern over Kings Hill site:
Productive farmland
Stoneleigh and other villages in danger of losing character.
Erosion of gap between Coventry, Kenilworth and Leamington.
Bore hole at Green Lane/Gretna Road junction for water extraction - becoming increasingly valuable.
Kings Hill Lane prone to surface water and flooding
Finham sewage works adjacent with resulting smells, especially in summer.
Building would to close to long, elevated section of A46 with resulting noise and air pollution
Proximity to flight path for Coventry airport with resulting air pollution
Massive amount of buildings needed in addition to houses resulting in more loss of green belt
Could result in Coventry becoming 'supercity' through absorption of villages - Kenilworth, Bubbenhall, Stoneleigh and Baginton
Wrong to allocate green belt land to accommodate unnecessary housing.