Object

Representation ID: 4408

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.L.K. Drew

Loss of land suitable for food production against govt. policy.

Object

Representation ID: 4413

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: M I Clement

Object to Kings Hill site
Loss of green belt between Coventry and Kenilworth

Object

Representation ID: 4438

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: JD & CL Mackenzie

Object to 4,200 new homes near Harbury Lane, Europa Way and Whitnash
Loss of green belt land

Support

Representation ID: 4454

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

support

Object

Representation ID: 4466

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Edward Norris

Object to site at Kings Hill
Green belt and should remain so. Primarily in agricultural use - unless soil is protected there is danger of local flooding and environmental damage caused by lack of carbon dioxide conversion.
Area contains many animal and bird species requiring our protection, not destruction of their habitat.
Surrounding area is not able to cope

Object

Representation ID: 4470

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Malkit Ram

Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt and devastating impact to landscape

Object

Representation ID: 4474

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Hazel Hier

Object to Kings Hill site:
Fields are used for crops and livestock - valuable farming land.
Wild life will suffer - muntjacks, squirrels, rabbits, pheasants and many more will lose habitat.
Previous plans to develop site thrown out 30 years ago - Coventry, Kenilworth, Leamington and Warwick would become urban sprawl.

Object

Representation ID: 4485

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Miss P Luckett

Object to Kings Hill site:
Green area around south of city has been gradually eroded over the years, lost to Warwick University and housing and bringing traffic chaos.
Green belt important to conservation of countryside - leave some green space to enjoy.

Object

Representation ID: 4497

Received: 30/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs D Matthews

Finham currently on the edge of countryside alongside the green belt, with its wildlife and farm land. The gap between Coventry and Kenilworth would be significantly reduced. Farmers would lose their livelihood.

Support

Representation ID: 4561

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Object

Representation ID: 4622

Received: 30/09/2009

Respondent: MR Dan Saxton

Green belt land benefits people - leisure, habitats, cleaner air and water, better use of land bordering cities.
Precedent - allowing green belt land to be developed will allow similar decisions to be made regarding other green belt sites.
Environment - When world focussed on saving precious resources WDC or Coventry destroying not maintaining.

Support

Representation ID: 4631

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Object

Representation ID: 4673

Received: 01/10/2009

Respondent: Mrs C Gribbon

Object to housing figure and the development of land south of Warwick, concentrating most of the development into small area.
Core strategy highlights need to protect environment yet proposed area of restraint will not protect environment or community of Bishops Tachbrook.

Object

Representation ID: 4691

Received: 02/10/2009

Respondent: E Holroyde

Deplorable that building planned in green belt and area of restraint established to preserve identities of settlements resulting in breach of trust between govt. and the people.

Object

Representation ID: 4693

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Cllr. Prof Maurice Shutler

Will use up green belt land which should be inviolate.

Object

Representation ID: 4698

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Pritchard

Object to Kings Hill site:
Large amount of wildlife in area affected. Kings Hill Lane - used by people on horses, cows and horses in fields, rabbits, foxes and badgers.

Object

Representation ID: 4701

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Ingram

Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt significantly reducing gap between Coventry and Kenilworth
Loss of valuable agricultural land when this is in short supply and should be retained for future
Poor drainage from Kings Hill leads to run-off on Kings Hill
Designated special landscape on Kings Hill
Badger population - protected species and plenty of other wildlife

Support

Representation ID: 4726

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

support

Support

Representation ID: 4727

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

support

Object

Representation ID: 4737

Received: 05/10/2009

Respondent: Miss M S Saben

Object to Kings Hill site:
Land is green belt

Object

Representation ID: 4742

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: V J Evans

Object to Kings Hill site:
Green belt

Object

Representation ID: 4746

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Walton

Object to Kings Hill site:
Affect on wildlife and green belt reducing gap between Coventry and Kenilworth.

Object

Representation ID: 4760

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs John & Margaret Pyner

Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt. Does not look to the future when we need green space and farming land to grow enough food. Not been clearly demonstrated that all brown field land utilised. Green space to south of city special and gives some division between Coventry and Kenilworth.

Object

Representation ID: 4764

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Allister

Object to Kings Hill site:
Green belt important to wildlife and farmland should be kept for food production.

Object

Representation ID: 4766

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Therese Allister

Object to Kings Hill site:
Green belt irreplaceable and should be protected for future generations.

Object

Representation ID: 4767

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Therese Allister

Object to Kings Hill site:
Building here would have terrible effect on quality of life for people of Finham and Green Lane as well as severely damaging local wildlife and archaeology.

Comment

Representation ID: 4769

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr L Morris

Essential green belt is maintained. Natural habitat for wildlife. Green areas, wood and forests are lungs of the planet and destruction would add to climate change not reduce it as cannot dictate to people where they will work.

Object

Representation ID: 4793

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Higgins

Contrary to alleged government directive, designated area of restraint should be respected as have been identfied for good reason.

Object

Representation ID: 4796

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: richard keylock

The Finham proposal fails on the below counts;
Vast areas of green belt loss, Vast areas of farmland loss, Flooding / drainage issues adjacent to Green Lane, loss of ancient hedgerows,trees ponds containing buzzards,owls,crested newts etc

Object

Representation ID: 4799

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Dr Martin Le Tocq

Locally, development should be restricted to brown field and in-fill sites to preserve green belt.