Showing comments and forms 421 to 450 of 1594

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7373

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Chris Green

Representation Summary:

Consultation essentially void until infrastructure studies completed and presented alongside proposals.
Timing and cost of infrastructure updates need to be confirmed. Funding route for updates also needs confirming.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7378

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Freeman

Representation Summary:

Infrastructure improvements: Need to improve existing infrastructure - roads and services - schools, hospitals, doctors, shops etc. Costs should be borne by developers. Council must ensure commitments given by developers delivered.
With Warwick Gates, infrastructure already under strain. Traffic/congestion levels risen to almost unacceptable level and shops struggle to meet demand. Approached regarding funding own ambulance on Warwick Gates as hospital ones cannot guarantee safe response time.
Adding people, cars will make these worse - quality of life will suffer. New development of size proposed must include supermarket, petrol station, school, doctors surgery, Post Office community centre.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7381

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Freeman

Representation Summary:

Schools: Because no school at Warwick Gates, children going to lots of different schools which has lead to increased travelling, congestion and pollution. Another problem is negative effect on sense of community on the estate. Any new development of this size or more would need its own school so these problems are not repeated.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7382

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Nicola Beasley

Representation Summary:

Consultation is essentially void until infrastructure studies completed and presented alongside proposals.
Timing and cost of infrastructure updates need to be confirmed. Funding route for updates also needs confirming.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7410

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr A Dobrovin - Pennington

Representation Summary:

Total lack of detail or alternative options put forward for public consultation. Plan presented without any proposed infrastructure shown or traffic studies on the area's existing infrastructure. The existing infrastructure such as the local schools and hospital are already fully subscribed and at full capacity. The hospital would require significant extension. No capacity for cars at the stations for commuters. * Existing traffic congestion already makes Myton Road impassable - there is no capacity for the additional 8,000 car journeys. resulting detrimental impact on the existing Warwick residents quality of life and adversely impact on local tourism.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7430

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Delaney

Representation Summary:

Shocked and dismayed to the proposed development because of the existing traffic congestion on Myton Road at peak hours and the traffic congestion in Warwick town centre, where it is already difficult to park. The additional housing would exacerbate this problem. The area cannot accommodate without detrimenting from the attractive environment of both Warwick and Leamington Spa

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7481

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J C Evans

Representation Summary:

The new development can only be accessed by using existing congested road network; land available in the Finham area could be served by a new railway station on the Kenilworth line, providing sustainable transport.
Concentrating the vast bulk of the housing in one area will lead to intolerable strain on the roads and services.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7484

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

The 4,200 new houses is going to disrupt our perfect village and take away its village status. We already have a great deal of traffic pass through and we don't need any more.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7486

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: B Prior

Representation Summary:

One further point, when we hear ministers saying on TV that there are concerns that we may not be able to generate enough energy for our country's needs in the near future and power cuts are a very real possibility, Why are we building more homes at these levels (4,000) and that's just in our area. Where do they think the energy to power these new homes is going to come from?

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7487

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

We live right on Harbury Lane on Cicero Approach. It already takes 15 minutes to get out onto Harbury Lane in the mornings. We don't need any more traffic.
We were also told when we bought the house that over the road was green belt and would never be built on.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7488

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Ian Walker

Representation Summary:

Schools are already heavily oversubscribed. How would this be addressed?

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7489

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

Representation Summary:

The route between Warwick Gates and Bishops Tachbrook is deemed unsafe for children to walk or cycle to school. The addition of all these houses will make it more dangerous.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7493

Received: 26/08/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

The infrastructure cannot cope now. How do you expect 4,200 homes to improve this?

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7497

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Simon Harris

Representation Summary:

No investigations into the required infrastructure has actually taken place - surely this is the first priority before deciding on 'preferred' options.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7504

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupiers

Representation Summary:

Concern about the pressure on the existing services from the additional housing. Particularly the impact of consequent increased traffic on the two bridge crossings, and the implications it has on access to emergency services.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7509

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terry Shepherd

Representation Summary:

How has the government or Warwick Council came up with figure of 8,100 new homes required by 2026 yet have no clue as to number of schools, doctors surgeries, shops etc. required by additional residents?
Little mention of additional roads that would be required to travel from new housing areas into Leamington - Europa Way can't cope as it is! Needs 21st century broadband. In Warwick Gates only receive 1/4 of broadband speed paid for due to thdistance from telephone exchange. Those new houses are even further away! Download speed will be so slow!

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7514

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Government Office for the West Midlands

Representation Summary:

The Infrastructure Delivery Plan should be part of a wider implementation plan setting out how different components of the strategy can be delivered, by which organisation and when. In terms of infrastructure, it is important that the necessary commitment to delivery from the relevant organisation is obtained and the evidence of this is provided.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7520

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David Ashbourne

Representation Summary:

The utilities, services are all stretched to the limit now. With major hospitals only accessible actross congested bridges over the river Avon, fear how long it will take emergency cases to get medical resources they need. Huge increase in traffic arising from at least 8000 new cars in area will lead to increase in pollution and reduce air quality further in area

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7523

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: A and M Cooly

Representation Summary:

There is inadequate space for the extra schools/nurseries/libraries and other community facilities necesary to support new development.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7527

Received: 11/12/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

Live in village because do not want to live on large estate. Like to be rural. To be told that they want to turn our pretty village into something else is diabolical. Have a right to choose how and where to live. Village is big enough and we do not have enough places in school for children that already live here. Have one small shop - no post office - a small doctors surgery - one pub. Could not cope with development. Leave us as we are, to build near this village would completely spoil and anger our community.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7528

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: I Autwal

Representation Summary:

There will never be enough utilities for the new houses, and there is not enough now!!

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7529

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Sevnarayon

Representation Summary:

Also concerned about schooling, children are already being turned away from their local schools due to insufficient space resulting in children having to be driven miles to schools in other towns, villages. This is due to bad planning, building new homes with no additional facilities to cope with the occupants.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7531

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Godfrey Platt

Representation Summary:

Building new houses is the easy bit. Providing all the required services is the problem - especially as many are already stretched to the limit, (doctors, hospitals, schools, fire and ambulance services, social services, police, electricity, gas, water, sewerage, public transport and new roads in and out of Warwick and Leamington). All these problems need to be addressed before houses are built (can you cope with the extra rubbish and recycled materials). I suspect that nothing will be done until the situation is completely desperate - and then only the bare minimum). Where is the money coming from?

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7532

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Dr Hashuratullah Khau

Representation Summary:

We have strong objections of these proposals for building new houses as the area already in stretched situation.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7533

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs A B Gardner

Representation Summary:

Unfortunately my wife had to be rushed to hospital by ambulance after a stroke 2 days ago and it took 45 minutes - due to heavy traffic - please, please, please take note of the serious traffic problems at certain times of the day - for us it could have been a matter of life or death.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7540

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Lynsey McLean

Representation Summary:

I have further concerns re: schools in the area, especially primary schools. As Warwick Gates residents already struggle to get their children into schools nearby and an increase in houses will only make matters 100 times worse. I don't accept any assurances that new schools will be built as this was the plan for Warwick Gates when in construction and that didn't happen.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7565

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs David and Sandra Hay

Representation Summary:

For a year we already had to send three of our children to a private school because we couldn't get our youngest in a local school of our choice.
For several years, Mr Hay himself has been forced to commute into London as work in his field here has dried up. Traffic is terrible and finding parking at Leamington Spa station near impossible and expensive at sensible times of the morning.
We already are struggling as a community. It is wrong in every sense of the word to suffocate this area with more homes and people we can't support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7568

Received: 21/09/2009

Respondent: Mr C Browne

Representation Summary:

The traffic at the main island is already heavy particularly at 17.00hrs. More homes will cause utter gridlock.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7569

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Robert Loveday

Representation Summary:

There are not enough schools to cope with the proposed number of new houses. The BT school would not cope with more students.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7572

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Caroline Loveday

Representation Summary:

The amount of traffic going through the villages is already excessive and a danger to my young children.