Showing comments and forms 391 to 420 of 1594

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7310

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Graeme Mascall and Emma Dickson

Representation Summary:

I would highlight the traffic issues. One principal route into Leamington is ridiculous and will lead to even more people taking a 'short cut' to avoid the queues through Bishops Tachbrook.
Council should have created new school with S106 monies provided by Gallagher when Warwick Gates was developed. Instead they chose to extend existing school facilities! This has already created problems and an additional 8,000 homes would compound the problem.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7314

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr P J Ash

Representation Summary:

We have recently moved from Essex where there is so much housing that the roads cannot cope. I had an 18 mile journey to do each day which should take around 25 mins but invariably took upwards of an hour. I can see the same thing happening here.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7315

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

The proposal smacks of expediency rather than logic or regard for existing residents. The traffic and impact on this area will be immense and has been given scant consideration and I object completely to the approach.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7316

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

We have problems getting out and in our drives at the moment. I dread to think what it would be like when 800 cars are on the road. Rethink.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7317

Received: 23/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs K E Wood

Representation Summary:

In addition another major concern to me as a mother of two small children is that I cannot understand why schools are not being planned. Schools in the area are over subscribed already: this will add to the already existing problem.
I would like to see details of extra leisure facilities that would need to be provided to accommodate a development of this size, which is too big and in the wrong place.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7318

Received: 29/08/2009

Respondent: I D Fletchey

Representation Summary:

The village school is in danger of losing its village identity - also ongoing problems with cars bringing children into the village from Warwick Gates causes parking problems before and after school
Problems with water supply and water pressure when Warwick Gates was built - this led to a group being established within the village and eventual support and intervention of James Plaskitt before problems were addressed and rectified.
Danger of this happening again!

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7319

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Hannan

Representation Summary:

The local area also does not have sufficient supply of schools, so building extra houses will put further strain on existing resources.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7323

Received: 02/12/2009

Respondent: Mrs Kathleen J Reason

Representation Summary:

Plan will ruin our village life it would go from being quiet and resful place, with noises not only from M40. but all round village. If main routes get blocked they will racing through main road of village, we have it sometimes already, but will get worse with more houses. I know we need new housing but 4200 so near us OTT. Surely there are more suitable places with roads and service.
What is going to happen to people in Mobile Home Park who choose to live in quiet area and will be in middle of new homes.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7324

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Normington

Representation Summary:

The school cannot take any more children as it has already accommodated all the children from Warwick Gates and I fear the siblings of children already there are not going to get in.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7325

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: L Burnell

Representation Summary:

We have already had Warwick Gates built on our doorstep. the roads, schools and services are only just about coping. Why put more strain on these services in our area.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7328

Received: 30/08/2009

Respondent: C J Gladwin

Representation Summary:

There is only one general store serving Bishops Tachbrook.
There is only one infant school in Bishops Tachbrook (causing traffic parking problems at drop off and pick up times).
There is only one post office serving Whitnash and Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates.
The bus service from Bishops Tachbrook is poor i.e. one bus every hour.
Mallory Road in Bishops Tachbrook is already a busy thoroughfare for M40 commuters.
An increase of some 10k people in 4.2k dwellings would further increase the overworked Croft Medical Centre in Bishops Tachbrook and the Sydenham as welll as the medical centre on Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7332

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: J C Slater

Representation Summary:

Warwick Gates has already stretched resources beyond amenities, especially schools. I vehemently object to this strategy.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7334

Received: 22/08/2009

Respondent: K Hal

Representation Summary:

To further my concerns, I am worried that there are no plans for any other schools. I have a young child and plans for more children. I want them to go to the village school but this will not be possible with all these new homes and no schools built. Tachbrook school and Whitnash are already stretched with the arrival of Warwick Gates and no school built. This is a mistake that can not be made again!!!

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7335

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: D M Rolf

Representation Summary:

I understand that some people in the village have had problems re water pressure since Warwick Gates was developed - this can only make things worse.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7336

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Jenny and Adrian Beran

Representation Summary:

Moved from Cubbington to Bishops Tachbrook for village life not found in Cubbington as its been too completely swallowed as Leamington suburb. Building on land between Warwick Gates and Bishops Tachbrook will be start of end of Bishops Tachbrook as village. Land has been chosenas it sits close by Warwick Gates and road infrastructure is in place. Not a good enough reason as social infrastructure is missing - schools, shops, restaurants, post office, pubs etc. Our local schools are oversubscribed and Warwick Gates has few shops or amentiies to cater for that development never mind a new one.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7338

Received: 26/08/2009

Respondent: A G R Hayles

Representation Summary:

Provision of additional school(s) should be a priority if the problem of placements is to be resolved - not more houses.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7339

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: E Hales

Representation Summary:

Local allocation of school placements are already very difficult.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7340

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: D H Sabin

Representation Summary:

One of my concerns is not just the number but there is no mention of further schools. Bear in mind that primary schools struggle with numbers now. The increase in traffic and vandalism and the wildlife environment which is important to any village which we are all trying to preserve. The deterioration in this aspect has to be halted.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7341

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

What about the future traffic conditions? In some areas they are bad enough already.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7345

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Andrew Ruddins

Representation Summary:

Concern at lack of infrastructure and road congestion and disruption to services during construction.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7347

Received: 06/09/2009

Respondent: A Gough

Representation Summary:

I specifically moved to a village community to avoid the exact problem that you are now proposing to drop on my door step. Larger communities inherinently breed a bigger problem of anti-social behaviour, traffic problems and a strain on an infrastructure that is struggling to cope as it is.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7350

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: P A Lewis

Representation Summary:

As there would probably be a lot more children there are no school places available. With many more extra cars road safety would be a real issue.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7352

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: M R Elliott

Representation Summary:

Proposed site would ruin village. five times as many houses as now. Already traffic congestion blocks up entrance and exits at times. Local school at bursting point. No local post office in village, only one shop. Local bus service very poor, none on Sundays or Bank Holidays means using own transport for most transactions. Gap between Warwick Gates and edge of village only few hundred metres now, all of which rich agricultural ground. We are supposed to be growing more of our own food. Where is this land going to be when you are dumping more houses on these sites.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7354

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Michelle and Beat Kumin

Representation Summary:

We are particularly concerned with the strain that this will put on the local infrastructure and resources (especially schools - high schools, primary schools). We also firmly believe that Bishops Tachbrook should remain as a village and not become a suburb of Whitnash, Warwick Gates, or anywhere else.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7357

Received: 06/09/2009

Respondent: Mr M M Beeby

Representation Summary:

Our social infrastructure is already stretched to capacity. Local children in Whitnash are finding it hard to secure places in their primary schools. We have no post office in Bishops Tachbrook and local shop does not provide range of fresh produce and competitively priced goods.
Community hall for village is apparently still in pipeline despite efforts of our departed vicar and you propose to add more pressure to our already stretched meagre resources?! Try planning and creating communities rather than jaded, souless rabit warrens where young, old and harrassed commuters barely feel an attachment to the place they call home!

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7358

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J & D Nash

Representation Summary:

How can they consider closing our Fire Station when they want so many more houses built in the area. Leamington service could not cope.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7360

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: B Kitt

Representation Summary:

Since Warwick Gates was built we have seen increased flooding on Bishops Tachbrook Road, especially at the entrance to the village; what has been planned to solve the problem?
Water supply pressure is not good at times in some parts of the village (top of Kingsley Road), more houses would surely make the problem worse.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7369

Received: 26/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Representation Summary:

Concentrations of housing will place more pressure on Warwick, Leamington and villages. Towns brought virtually to standstill by rush hour traffic. Morning queues to towns from south stretch onto M40 and Banbury Road.
Bishops Tachbrook affected badly. Journeys to hospital difficult. Inadequate bus service.
Canal, river and railway bridges limit traffic flow. Expansion would severely affect residents quality of life.
Lack of school at Warwick Gates means children obtained places in Bishops Tachbrook school resulting in village children being refused. They have to be driven to school.
Enormous housing estates will re-create serious water supply difficulties already suffered.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7370

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: C Tibbs

Representation Summary:

Schools are also filled to capacity.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7372

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

Cutting of hedges, grass and removing of broken glass, grafitti not done now by Council. How do you hope to do this with an extra 4,200 more homes to look after?