Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7233
Received: 22/08/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Pike
To get to my office in Warwick some three miles from Whitnash on a week day in term time I need to leave ny 8am otherwise I experience long delays.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7241
Received: 28/08/2009
Respondent: Mrs J E White
I was very concerned to hear when attending the meetings that although we are shown plans for the housing there are no plans for the infrastructure. This show a total lack of common sense.
We do not want a rerun of Warwick Gates. They were promised a school. They got a sort of playing field in a lonely spot along the road to Harbury, miles away from the estate. No school. Result - gross overcrowding in the Whitnash schools.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7243
Received: 26/11/2009
Respondent: D Roebuck
The only people who will benefit will be developers and landowners who will line their pockets at the expense of the good people of Whitnash.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7250
Received: 02/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs R A Norton
How would sewers cope with more houses?
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7255
Received: 03/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Keith Allen
M40 exits/entrances already regular 'overspill' back to M40 (juntion 15 and Whitnash).
What cost to Severn Trent and ourselves for new infrastructure to be built.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7256
Received: 03/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs J M Dunkley
We have lived at this address for 25 years and in that time we have watched new developments stretch both the road network/school catchment areas and community resources i.e. shops etc. Enough is enough. I witnessed the other day what I can only presume was the surveyors out on the Tachbrook Road/Harbury Lane area doing what could have been a traffic survey again, what a joke, this was both in the school holidays and in the middle of the day. It should be done at peak/rush hour times.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7259
Received: 26/08/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
Area south of river has already experienced too much development, resulting in crowded roads, lack of services and overcrowded schools. There is not the infrastucture to support further housing development.
All development, is severely hampered by access into and through Leamington. Unless this is addressed south Leamington should not be considered for further development. Three problems:railway line, canal and River Leam.
Projections for vehicle movements again have been underestimated.
Public transport is poor and very expensive
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7260
Received: 22/08/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
When Warwick Gates was built we had major disruption for months whilst new sewers etc. were built, even now in parts of Whitnash the services have trouble in managing. The promised new school has never been built. Things like this need to be addressed before any houses are even considered.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7262
Received: 18/08/2009
Respondent: M Weeks
We are very concerned about the excessive traffic that will be generated going and coming from the two schools on Coppice Road.
It is impossible to use the roads in the vicinity safely while the school run is in progress.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7263
Received: 03/09/2009
Respondent: Dalvinder Basi
I moved to where I am situated on Golf Lane due to its quiet location, which would not be the case if the above development was allowed due to through traffic.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7264
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Lynne and Michael Gougeon
It would be a real mistake to cram so many more houses in the proposed areas and put so much pressure on the infrastructure, not to mention the environmental damage.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7266
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: J R A Warmington
We are called a town but have no town facilities: No bank, cafe (both for elderly and youngsters), shortage of schools, no sports centre, gym or swimming pool, no civic building, optician. A new community centre is needed with facilities for 'five a side' football, tennis, badminton etc. (Acre Close is past sell by date. Only built in last 25 years). The youngsters need it. I say no to any more building, but if we have no choice in the matter, please do not build any more homes until you provide facilities for the people who will live in them.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7271
Received: 17/08/2009
Respondent: S Taylor
Where is the access to this development proposed to be? Harbury Lane, Tachbrook Road, Landor Road and Ashford Road are already extremely busy roads! Residents have great difficulty getting on and off drives.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7272
Received: 16/08/2009
Respondent: M Murray
Community Nursing Services are stretched to breaking point. Warwickshire PCT is 27 million overspent - we cannot afford further development in terms of health services.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7276
Received: 17/08/2009
Respondent: R Harris
My wife works in Warwick, the journey home can now take up to 40 minutes to do just 4 miles.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7278
Received: 05/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
Not enough schools or work in this area for existing residents.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7283
Received: 07/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs J Higgins
If they wish to build 4500 houses that means an extra 9000 cars. Nearly everyone has two cars each household, often three or four.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7284
Received: 02/09/2009
Respondent: M Cullinane
School admissions already a problem and that's with an already established Warwick Gates and Sydenham getting bigger.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7290
Received: 13/09/2009
Respondent: Hanna Horsley
I want my daughter to have green areas to play in to have the option of schools she can attend and knowing there will be space in the classes and someone to give her the attention she deserves.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7291
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Louise Young
It is difficult enough to get into Briar Hill and with further houses in the area - I feel my children will suffer.The roads are busy enough and with lots of job losses in the area I feel Whitnash folk are being neglected on their views by the local council.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7293
Received: 09/09/2009
Respondent: V J Cooper
4,000 homes means 8,000 cars. The roads cannot cope now.
4,000 homes means a possible 12,000 people all needing to use the over used facilities at present - schools, hospitals, roads.
You, the Council in the past 18 years that I have lived here have done very little to improve the life for the current population, young people in particular.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7296
Received: 29/09/2009
Respondent: S Jones
Schooling is also a major problem. There are not enough spaces for the existing community.
This is a particular problem for Warwick Gates residents with primary schools.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7297
Received: 29/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs P R Groves
If WDC are serious about these plans, basic questions about the effects of infrastructure, schooling and other public services need public detailed answers. Without such detailed planning WDC lacks credibility.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7300
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: E Read
If we are to endure any more housing how are we going to be able to educate all the new children as so many Tachbrook children this year were refused a place and had to go elsewhere. Facilities are not very good as it is for the people we already have i.e. shops. No dentists, only a doctors open short hours. I would like to know your views on this.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7302
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs A Bastable
Amongst parents like ourselves, there is great concern that extra houses without another one or two primary schools will be extremely detrimental to the education of all local children. Warwick Gates residents' children are already having to travel 3+ miles to school!!
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7303
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs L H Pratt
It was bad enough having Warwick Gates move in and rob us of our water supply, our school and the resulting cars parked in Hassall Close and Kingsley Road added to which Myton School was no longer the first choice for our local children.
They are bigger than Tachbrook so let them build their own schools and give us back our village.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7304
Received: 30/11/2009
Respondent: Steven Davison
I, like many others who live on Warwick Gates, commute outside of the region to work every day and the queues in the morning and evening are often horrendous in Harbury Lane, Europa Way area. I cannot see local people buying expensive new housing so more people will commute outside of the area, the roads will not be able to cope neither will the facilities for local people, doctors, shops etc.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7306
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Cook
As we have two young children we are extremely concerned re: lack of primary school places already. Plus would the boundaries for secondary school change because of the development?
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7307
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Tony Prescott
There is no evidence that you are able to maintain and sustain basic infrastructure including roadways, drainage, refuse management and hedgerows on the outskirts of your jurisdiction. Extending outwards is lazy and ultimately outdated as a strategy.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7309
Received: 15/09/2009
Respondent: Lisa Dadswell
Schools for the local community - already not enough places for primary school children. Many travelling long distances to get into a school of choice. Hence again transport systems and yes, we would like to be able to walk the children to school - even more of an impossibility.