Showing comments and forms 361 to 390 of 1594

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7233

Received: 22/08/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Pike

Representation Summary:

To get to my office in Warwick some three miles from Whitnash on a week day in term time I need to leave ny 8am otherwise I experience long delays.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7241

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs J E White

Representation Summary:

I was very concerned to hear when attending the meetings that although we are shown plans for the housing there are no plans for the infrastructure. This show a total lack of common sense.
We do not want a rerun of Warwick Gates. They were promised a school. They got a sort of playing field in a lonely spot along the road to Harbury, miles away from the estate. No school. Result - gross overcrowding in the Whitnash schools.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7243

Received: 26/11/2009

Respondent: D Roebuck

Representation Summary:

The only people who will benefit will be developers and landowners who will line their pockets at the expense of the good people of Whitnash.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7250

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs R A Norton

Representation Summary:

How would sewers cope with more houses?

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7255

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Keith Allen

Representation Summary:

M40 exits/entrances already regular 'overspill' back to M40 (juntion 15 and Whitnash).
What cost to Severn Trent and ourselves for new infrastructure to be built.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7256

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J M Dunkley

Representation Summary:

We have lived at this address for 25 years and in that time we have watched new developments stretch both the road network/school catchment areas and community resources i.e. shops etc. Enough is enough. I witnessed the other day what I can only presume was the surveyors out on the Tachbrook Road/Harbury Lane area doing what could have been a traffic survey again, what a joke, this was both in the school holidays and in the middle of the day. It should be done at peak/rush hour times.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7259

Received: 26/08/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

Area south of river has already experienced too much development, resulting in crowded roads, lack of services and overcrowded schools. There is not the infrastucture to support further housing development.
All development, is severely hampered by access into and through Leamington. Unless this is addressed south Leamington should not be considered for further development. Three problems:railway line, canal and River Leam.
Projections for vehicle movements again have been underestimated.
Public transport is poor and very expensive

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7260

Received: 22/08/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

When Warwick Gates was built we had major disruption for months whilst new sewers etc. were built, even now in parts of Whitnash the services have trouble in managing. The promised new school has never been built. Things like this need to be addressed before any houses are even considered.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7262

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: M Weeks

Representation Summary:

We are very concerned about the excessive traffic that will be generated going and coming from the two schools on Coppice Road.
It is impossible to use the roads in the vicinity safely while the school run is in progress.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7263

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Dalvinder Basi

Representation Summary:

I moved to where I am situated on Golf Lane due to its quiet location, which would not be the case if the above development was allowed due to through traffic.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7264

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Lynne and Michael Gougeon

Representation Summary:

It would be a real mistake to cram so many more houses in the proposed areas and put so much pressure on the infrastructure, not to mention the environmental damage.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7266

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: J R A Warmington

Representation Summary:

We are called a town but have no town facilities: No bank, cafe (both for elderly and youngsters), shortage of schools, no sports centre, gym or swimming pool, no civic building, optician. A new community centre is needed with facilities for 'five a side' football, tennis, badminton etc. (Acre Close is past sell by date. Only built in last 25 years). The youngsters need it. I say no to any more building, but if we have no choice in the matter, please do not build any more homes until you provide facilities for the people who will live in them.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7271

Received: 17/08/2009

Respondent: S Taylor

Representation Summary:

Where is the access to this development proposed to be? Harbury Lane, Tachbrook Road, Landor Road and Ashford Road are already extremely busy roads! Residents have great difficulty getting on and off drives.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7272

Received: 16/08/2009

Respondent: M Murray

Representation Summary:

Community Nursing Services are stretched to breaking point. Warwickshire PCT is 27 million overspent - we cannot afford further development in terms of health services.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7276

Received: 17/08/2009

Respondent: R Harris

Representation Summary:

My wife works in Warwick, the journey home can now take up to 40 minutes to do just 4 miles.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7278

Received: 05/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

Not enough schools or work in this area for existing residents.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7283

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Higgins

Representation Summary:

If they wish to build 4500 houses that means an extra 9000 cars. Nearly everyone has two cars each household, often three or four.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7284

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: M Cullinane

Representation Summary:

School admissions already a problem and that's with an already established Warwick Gates and Sydenham getting bigger.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7290

Received: 13/09/2009

Respondent: Hanna Horsley

Representation Summary:

I want my daughter to have green areas to play in to have the option of schools she can attend and knowing there will be space in the classes and someone to give her the attention she deserves.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7291

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Louise Young

Representation Summary:

It is difficult enough to get into Briar Hill and with further houses in the area - I feel my children will suffer.The roads are busy enough and with lots of job losses in the area I feel Whitnash folk are being neglected on their views by the local council.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7293

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: V J Cooper

Representation Summary:

4,000 homes means 8,000 cars. The roads cannot cope now.
4,000 homes means a possible 12,000 people all needing to use the over used facilities at present - schools, hospitals, roads.
You, the Council in the past 18 years that I have lived here have done very little to improve the life for the current population, young people in particular.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7296

Received: 29/09/2009

Respondent: S Jones

Representation Summary:

Schooling is also a major problem. There are not enough spaces for the existing community.
This is a particular problem for Warwick Gates residents with primary schools.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7297

Received: 29/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs P R Groves

Representation Summary:

If WDC are serious about these plans, basic questions about the effects of infrastructure, schooling and other public services need public detailed answers. Without such detailed planning WDC lacks credibility.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7300

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: E Read

Representation Summary:

If we are to endure any more housing how are we going to be able to educate all the new children as so many Tachbrook children this year were refused a place and had to go elsewhere. Facilities are not very good as it is for the people we already have i.e. shops. No dentists, only a doctors open short hours. I would like to know your views on this.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7302

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs A Bastable

Representation Summary:

Amongst parents like ourselves, there is great concern that extra houses without another one or two primary schools will be extremely detrimental to the education of all local children. Warwick Gates residents' children are already having to travel 3+ miles to school!!

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7303

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs L H Pratt

Representation Summary:

It was bad enough having Warwick Gates move in and rob us of our water supply, our school and the resulting cars parked in Hassall Close and Kingsley Road added to which Myton School was no longer the first choice for our local children.
They are bigger than Tachbrook so let them build their own schools and give us back our village.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7304

Received: 30/11/2009

Respondent: Steven Davison

Representation Summary:

I, like many others who live on Warwick Gates, commute outside of the region to work every day and the queues in the morning and evening are often horrendous in Harbury Lane, Europa Way area. I cannot see local people buying expensive new housing so more people will commute outside of the area, the roads will not be able to cope neither will the facilities for local people, doctors, shops etc.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7306

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Cook

Representation Summary:

As we have two young children we are extremely concerned re: lack of primary school places already. Plus would the boundaries for secondary school change because of the development?

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7307

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Tony Prescott

Representation Summary:

There is no evidence that you are able to maintain and sustain basic infrastructure including roadways, drainage, refuse management and hedgerows on the outskirts of your jurisdiction. Extending outwards is lazy and ultimately outdated as a strategy.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7309

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Lisa Dadswell

Representation Summary:

Schools for the local community - already not enough places for primary school children. Many travelling long distances to get into a school of choice. Hence again transport systems and yes, we would like to be able to walk the children to school - even more of an impossibility.