Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40442
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Sally Ford
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40444
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Sally Ford
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40450
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: C G Arthurton
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40452
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: C G Arthurton
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40458
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs J M and G J Taylor
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40460
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr & Mrs J M and G J Taylor
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40466
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Ms June Kathleen Earles
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40468
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Ms June Kathleen Earles
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40474
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: D Clay
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40476
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: D Clay
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40482
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: R Bartley
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40484
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: R Bartley
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40490
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Gerald Smith
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40492
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Gerald Smith
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40498
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Janet White
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40500
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Janet White
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40506
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: D Newman
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40508
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: D Newman
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40514
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: H J Bufton
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40516
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: H J Bufton
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40522
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Julie Calcutt
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40524
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Ms Julie Calcutt
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40530
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Alex Hickerton
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40532
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Alex Hickerton
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40538
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Bruce Cleveley
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40540
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Bruce Cleveley
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40546
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Peggy J Stone
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40548
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Peggy J Stone
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40554
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A M Castledine
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40556
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A M Castledine
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.