Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40322
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: D E Alderson
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40324
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: D E Alderson
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40330
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A M Burton
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40332
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A M Burton
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40338
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Shaw
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40340
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Shaw
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40346
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Lisa Probert
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40348
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Lisa Probert
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40354
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Valerie Anne Jones
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40356
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Valerie Anne Jones
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40362
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Avery
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40364
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Avery
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40370
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Robert Vallis
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40372
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Robert Vallis
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40378
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Thompson
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40380
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Thompson
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40386
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Flather
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40388
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Flather
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40394
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Graham Turner
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40396
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Graham Turner
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40402
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: J Daly
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40404
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: J Daly
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40410
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: T Smith-Grimes
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40412
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: T Smith-Grimes
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40418
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A Mureanex
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40420
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A Mureanex
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40426
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40428
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40434
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs J Higgins
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 40436
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs J Higgins
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.