Object

Representation ID: 39474

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs A M Hickerton

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39476

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs A M Hickerton

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39482

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Carolyn Wiles

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39484

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Carolyn Wiles

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39490

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: S M Wiles

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39492

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: S M Wiles

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39498

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A Hickerton

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39500

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A Hickerton

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39506

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Marina Cleveley

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39508

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Marina Cleveley

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39514

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: L Cleveley

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39516

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: L Cleveley

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39522

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A Laspisa

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39524

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A Laspisa

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39530

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs T Whitehouse

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39532

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs T Whitehouse

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39538

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: K Crutchley

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39540

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: K Crutchley

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39546

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: R McCabrey

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39548

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: R McCabrey

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39554

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Michael L Cox

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39556

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Michael L Cox

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39562

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Haresh Chachcani

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39564

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Haresh Chachcani

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39570

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: R Harris

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39572

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: R Harris

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39578

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: M Murray

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39580

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: M Murray

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39586

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: S Taylor

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39588

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: S Taylor

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.