Object

Representation ID: 39321

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Melissa and Tom Horrocks

Recent Bishops Tachbrook Housing Needs Survey indicated only 15 houses required. Do not need the proposed 4200 houses.
The additional 4200 houses located between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the identity of Bishops Tachbrook as a village and if it became another suburb of Leamington, it would reduce the quality of life for the community of Warwick Gates.
Proposed large housing development would lack social cohesion resulting in anti social behaviour - there are poor public transport links to meet the needs of proposed 40% affordable homes.

Object

Representation ID: 39331

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Payne

Recent Bishops Tachbrook Housing Needs Survey indicated only 15 houses required. Do not need the proposed 4200 houses.
The additional 4200 houses located between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the identity of Bishops Tachbrook as a village and if it became another suburb of Leamington, it would reduce the quality of life for the community of Warwick Gates.
Proposed large housing development would lack social cohesion resulting in anti social behaviour - there are poor public transport links to meet the needs of proposed 40% affordable homes.

Object

Representation ID: 39341

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Janet Morritt

Recent Bishops Tachbrook Housing Needs Survey indicated only 15 houses required. Do not need the proposed 4200 houses.
The additional 4200 houses located between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the identity of Bishops Tachbrook as a village and if it became another suburb of Leamington, it would reduce the quality of life for the community of Warwick Gates.
Proposed large housing development would lack social cohesion resulting in anti social behaviour - there are poor public transport links to meet the needs of proposed 40% affordable homes.

Object

Representation ID: 39351

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs H S Johnson

Recent Bishops Tachbrook Housing Needs Survey indicated only 15 houses required. Do not need the proposed 4200 houses.
The additional 4200 houses located between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the identity of Bishops Tachbrook as a village and if it became another suburb of Leamington, it would reduce the quality of life for the community of Warwick Gates.
Proposed large housing development would lack social cohesion resulting in anti social behaviour - there are poor public transport links to meet the needs of proposed 40% affordable homes.

Object

Representation ID: 39361

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Dr Eirian Curzon

Recent Bishops Tachbrook Housing Needs Survey indicated only 15 houses required. Do not need the proposed 4200 houses.
The additional 4200 houses located between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the identity of Bishops Tachbrook as a village and if it became another suburb of Leamington, it would reduce the quality of life for the community of Warwick Gates.
Proposed large housing development would lack social cohesion resulting in anti social behaviour - there are poor public transport links to meet the needs of proposed 40% affordable homes.

Object

Representation ID: 39371

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R Virdi

Recent Bishops Tachbrook Housing Needs Survey indicated only 15 houses required. Do not need the proposed 4200 houses.
The additional 4200 houses located between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the identity of Bishops Tachbrook as a village and if it became another suburb of Leamington, it would reduce the quality of life for the community of Warwick Gates.
Proposed large housing development would lack social cohesion resulting in anti social behaviour - there are poor public transport links to meet the needs of proposed 40% affordable homes.

Object

Representation ID: 39378

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Farrington

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39380

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs J Farrington

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39386

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: D R Ariss

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39388

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: D R Ariss

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39394

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: G Lane

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39396

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: G Lane

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39402

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: M Weeks

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39404

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: M Weeks

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39410

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs R Johns

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39412

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr & Mrs R Johns

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39418

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David Fisher

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39420

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David Fisher

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39426

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Oliver

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39428

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Oliver

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39434

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: J W Underhill

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39436

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: J W Underhill

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39442

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: C M Copoon

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39444

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: C M Copoon

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39450

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Liam Floyd

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39452

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Liam Floyd

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39458

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: S Morris

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39460

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: S Morris

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 39466

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: S Aitken

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Representation ID: 39468

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: S Aitken

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.