Procedures/ Process
Support
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71612
Received: 17/02/2020
Respondent: AC Lloyd Homes c/o Delta Planning
Agent: Delta Planning
The SPD makes an allowance for viability arguments to be put forward, where the level of developer contributions would render a project unviable. In these cases, an Economic Viability Assessment (EVA) can support a proposal and contributions can be negotiated. This approach is welcomed.
Support
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71613
Received: 17/02/2020
Respondent: Deeley Group Ltd c/o Delta Planning
Agent: Delta Planning
The SPD makes an allowance for viability arguments to be put forward, where the level of developer contributions would render a project unviable. In these cases, an Economic Viability Assessment (EVA) can support a proposal and contributions can be negotiated. This approach is welcomed.
Comment
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71614
Received: 17/02/2020
Respondent: AC Lloyd Homes c/o Delta Planning
Agent: Delta Planning
Figure 3 - Minor correction required - Duplication of ‘Application Refused’ within flow chart.
Comment
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71615
Received: 17/02/2020
Respondent: Deeley Group Ltd c/o Delta Planning
Agent: Delta Planning
Figure 3 - Minor correction required - Duplication of ‘Application Refused’ within flow chart.
Object
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71616
Received: 17/02/2020
Respondent: AC Lloyd Homes c/o Delta Planning
Agent: Delta Planning
Money obtained via unilateral undertaking can be returned to developers if unspent.
Object
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71618
Received: 17/02/2020
Respondent: Deeley Group Ltd c/o Delta Planning
Agent: Delta Planning
Money obtained via unilateral undertaking can be returned to developers if unspent.
Support
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71726
Received: 20/02/2020
Respondent: Barton Willmore (now Stantec)
Procedures / Process (Viability)
Support is given to the SPD statement that recognises that some development proposals may be unable to meet all of the relevant policy and planning obligations while remaining economically viable / deliverable.
Support
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71743
Received: 12/02/2020
Respondent: Ms Maxine Kennedy
Taylor Wimpey supports the overall objective of the Developer Contributions SPD, however it wishes to identify areas where it believes the document can be clarified.
Support
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71775
Received: 21/02/2020
Respondent: Barton Willmore
Procedures / Process (Viability)
Support is given to the SPD statement that recognises that some development proposals may be unable to meet all of the relevant policy and planning obligations while remaining economically viable / deliverable.
Comment
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71776
Received: 21/02/2020
Respondent: Barton Willmore
SPD should stipulate that Neighbourhood Plan policies are not expected to seek in excess of the Local Plan policy requirement, and that any that do must be the subject of a neighbourhood plan viability assessment.
Object
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71777
Received: 21/02/2020
Respondent: Barton Willmore
The text of the SPD should replicate the assumptions made / indicated on the CIL and Section 106 elements of the Council’s website that that set out the financial assumption for infrastructure contributions per dwelling on sites of various threshold