Procedures/ Process

Showing comments and forms 1 to 11 of 11

Support

Developer Contributions SPD

Representation ID: 71612

Received: 17/02/2020

Respondent: AC Lloyd Homes c/o Delta Planning

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

The SPD makes an allowance for viability arguments to be put forward, where the level of developer contributions would render a project unviable. In these cases, an Economic Viability Assessment (EVA) can support a proposal and contributions can be negotiated. This approach is welcomed.

Support

Developer Contributions SPD

Representation ID: 71613

Received: 17/02/2020

Respondent: Deeley Group Ltd c/o Delta Planning

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

The SPD makes an allowance for viability arguments to be put forward, where the level of developer contributions would render a project unviable. In these cases, an Economic Viability Assessment (EVA) can support a proposal and contributions can be negotiated. This approach is welcomed.

Comment

Developer Contributions SPD

Representation ID: 71614

Received: 17/02/2020

Respondent: AC Lloyd Homes c/o Delta Planning

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

Figure 3 - Minor correction required - Duplication of ‘Application Refused’ within flow chart.

Comment

Developer Contributions SPD

Representation ID: 71615

Received: 17/02/2020

Respondent: Deeley Group Ltd c/o Delta Planning

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

Figure 3 - Minor correction required - Duplication of ‘Application Refused’ within flow chart.

Object

Developer Contributions SPD

Representation ID: 71616

Received: 17/02/2020

Respondent: AC Lloyd Homes c/o Delta Planning

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

Money obtained via unilateral undertaking can be returned to developers if unspent.

Object

Developer Contributions SPD

Representation ID: 71618

Received: 17/02/2020

Respondent: Deeley Group Ltd c/o Delta Planning

Agent: Delta Planning

Representation Summary:

Money obtained via unilateral undertaking can be returned to developers if unspent.

Support

Developer Contributions SPD

Representation ID: 71726

Received: 20/02/2020

Respondent: Barton Willmore (now Stantec)

Representation Summary:

Procedures / Process (Viability)
Support is given to the SPD statement that recognises that some development proposals may be unable to meet all of the relevant policy and planning obligations while remaining economically viable / deliverable.

Support

Developer Contributions SPD

Representation ID: 71743

Received: 12/02/2020

Respondent: Ms Maxine Kennedy

Representation Summary:

Taylor Wimpey supports the overall objective of the Developer Contributions SPD, however it wishes to identify areas where it believes the document can be clarified.

Support

Developer Contributions SPD

Representation ID: 71775

Received: 21/02/2020

Respondent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

Procedures / Process (Viability)
Support is given to the SPD statement that recognises that some development proposals may be unable to meet all of the relevant policy and planning obligations while remaining economically viable / deliverable.

Comment

Developer Contributions SPD

Representation ID: 71776

Received: 21/02/2020

Respondent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

SPD should stipulate that Neighbourhood Plan policies are not expected to seek in excess of the Local Plan policy requirement, and that any that do must be the subject of a neighbourhood plan viability assessment.

Object

Developer Contributions SPD

Representation ID: 71777

Received: 21/02/2020

Respondent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

The text of the SPD should replicate the assumptions made / indicated on the CIL and Section 106 elements of the Council’s website that that set out the financial assumption for infrastructure contributions per dwelling on sites of various threshold