Purpose of this Document

Comment

Representation ID: 71610

Received: 17/02/2020

Respondent: AC Lloyd Homes c/o Delta Planning

Agent: Delta Planning

Incorrect quotation of National Planning Practice Guidance.

Comment

Representation ID: 71611

Received: 17/02/2020

Respondent: Deeley Group Ltd c/o Delta Planning

Agent: Delta Planning

Incorrect quotation of National Planning Practice Guidance.

Object

Representation ID: 71724

Received: 20/02/2020

Respondent: Barton Willmore (now Stantec)

Legislative Context
SPD should be expanded to make reference to the Community Infrastructure Regulations and relevant sections of the NPPF and PPG ,particularly the standard approach to viability assessments.

Object

Representation ID: 71725

Received: 20/02/2020

Respondent: Barton Willmore (now Stantec)

Legislative Context
SPD needs to make specific reference to the relationship between CIL, and S106 with regard to Infrastructure funding (including the requirement for Local Authorities to set out an Annual Infrastructure Statement).

Object

Representation ID: 71727

Received: 20/02/2020

Respondent: Barton Willmore (now Stantec)

SPD should stipulate that Neighbourhood Plan policies are not expected to seek in excess of the Local Plan policy requirement, and that any that do must be the subject of a neighbourhood plan viability assessment.

Object

Representation ID: 71740

Received: 21/02/2020

Respondent: Gladman Developments

In order to avoid confusion, it is suggested that the Council make clear which stakeholder is responsible for the requests and, where possible, the delivery of each contribution tied to a development

Object

Representation ID: 71763

Received: 15/01/2020

Respondent: Place Partnership Limited (PPL)

Planning Obligations – WP request that the third bullet point of this section is amended to read ‘ Offset relevant adverse impacts , for example, on the environment, education, social, emergency services, recreational and community facilities and transport that arise from development where the development might otherwise been refused because of these adverse impacts.’