Purpose of this Document
Comment
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71610
Received: 17/02/2020
Respondent: AC Lloyd Homes c/o Delta Planning
Agent: Delta Planning
Incorrect quotation of National Planning Practice Guidance.
Comment
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71611
Received: 17/02/2020
Respondent: Deeley Group Ltd c/o Delta Planning
Agent: Delta Planning
Incorrect quotation of National Planning Practice Guidance.
Object
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71724
Received: 20/02/2020
Respondent: Barton Willmore (now Stantec)
Legislative Context
SPD should be expanded to make reference to the Community Infrastructure Regulations and relevant sections of the NPPF and PPG ,particularly the standard approach to viability assessments.
Object
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71725
Received: 20/02/2020
Respondent: Barton Willmore (now Stantec)
Legislative Context
SPD needs to make specific reference to the relationship between CIL, and S106 with regard to Infrastructure funding (including the requirement for Local Authorities to set out an Annual Infrastructure Statement).
Object
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71727
Received: 20/02/2020
Respondent: Barton Willmore (now Stantec)
SPD should stipulate that Neighbourhood Plan policies are not expected to seek in excess of the Local Plan policy requirement, and that any that do must be the subject of a neighbourhood plan viability assessment.
Object
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71740
Received: 21/02/2020
Respondent: Gladman Developments
In order to avoid confusion, it is suggested that the Council make clear which stakeholder is responsible for the requests and, where possible, the delivery of each contribution tied to a development
Object
Developer Contributions SPD
Representation ID: 71763
Received: 15/01/2020
Respondent: Place Partnership Limited (PPL)
Planning Obligations – WP request that the third bullet point of this section is amended to read ‘ Offset relevant adverse impacts , for example, on the environment, education, social, emergency services, recreational and community facilities and transport that arise from development where the development might otherwise been refused because of these adverse impacts.’