Explanation

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 68412

Received: 19/04/2016

Respondent: Leamington Society

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The revised Local Plan is not sustainable and does not conform with NPPF 4.29, 4.32 and 4.35

Full text:

The SA consultation considers "Likely Effects of the Local Plan Modifications" (pp 21-25) on Transport & Accessibility, Air Quality and Climate Change. It acknowledges in each case the "potential to increase the significance of negative effects". It then comments on "a range of mitigation strategies ... which will contribute to reducing the extent of these negative effects" but will not eliminate them.
The SA also shows extensive colour coded charts featuring numerous question marks in the various boxes. Thus we are offered a verbose, shuffling, imprecise narrative, which suggests the outcome may not be all that bad.

In the infrastructure planning there are hopeful suggestions of bus services to all these new developments. Yet well-established professional experience indicates that at low densities of 30 - 35 dwellings per hectare there is little prospect of effective bus services to provide a genuine and attractive alternative to the car. There is therefore no doubt that these proposed suburbs will be highly dependent on the motor car. Road planning, such as for Europa Way, confirms this expectation that the Local Plan is car-dependent and continues unreformed highway policies giving priority to motor traffic, largely in disregard of the NPPF clauses quoted above. This attempt to facilitate ever increasing volumes of traffic means that the extra flows along Europa Way will impact heavily on Warwick or Leamington or both. In mitigation we are offered schemes like the South Leamington gyratory, where the impulse to force through more traffic is most unlikely to "give priority to pedestrian and cycle movements". On the contrary, shoppers and visitors to the intended Creative Quarter will face an intimidating traffic circuit together with more air pollution.

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 68575

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Mr JOHN BOILEAU

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

WDC has applied a detailed analysis of individual areas, area by area, but I see no evidence that the planners have stepped back from the map and asked the bigger grander question of "how do we want this map to look in 20 years; what is the overall shape of Leamington and Warwick that we are aiming at, and how can we achieve that". The obsession with justifying the detail has obscured the important big picture.

Full text:

WDC has applied a detailed analysis of individual areas, area by area, but I see no evidence that the planners have stepped back from the map and asked the bigger grander question of "how do we want this map to look in 20 years; what is the overall shape of Leamington and Warwick that we are aiming at, and how can we achieve that". The obsession with justifying the detail has obscured the important big picture.

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 68585

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs Jonquil Solt

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Park and Ride seems to be successful in historic towns - principally in Oxford - where it offers easy access to many occasional visitors who want 'to see the town'. I doubt if this applies to Leamington. Experience shows that Park and Ride is likely to fail unless it receives financial support and other restrictive traffic regulations. If it does succeed it generates even more traffic in the surrounding road network, which would not be welcome.

Full text:

Park and Ride seems to be successful in historic towns - principally in Oxford - where it offers easy access to many occasional visitors who want 'to see the town'. I doubt if this applies to Leamington. Experience shows that Park and Ride is likely to fail unless it receives financial support and other restrictive traffic regulations. If it does succeed it generates even more traffic in the surrounding road network, which would not be welcome.