H50 - Cubbington - Land east of Cubbington

Showing comments and forms 31 to 42 of 42

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69437

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Diane Fathers

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Cubbington already busy with traffic especially the village centre at school times.
School is at capacity. new houses will mean children in surrounding areas will be out of catchment with nowhere to go.
No infrastructure to support an increase in population in the village. Nearest GP planning to move further away.
Flooding already an issue, poor drainage. More houses will compound problems
Site is in the green belt and should stay.
Increasing size will take away village feeling.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69438

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Miss Judy Rees-Jones

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Access into Coventry Road and at Rugby Road - accident hotspot.
Potential increase in flooding.
Lack of schooling and infrastructure.
Increase in number of dwellings with no consultation.
No exceptional circumstances in the green belt.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Support

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69455

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Bellway Homes (West Midlands)

Agent: Hunter Page Planning

Representation Summary:

Supports the addition of Polices Map 13 and its identification of the Land East of Cubbington (H50) as a new housing allocation including its removal from the Green Belt. The removal of the site from the Green Belt and its allocation for residential development will assist the Council in meeting its housing need in sustainable locations on the edge of built up areas and ensuring an adequate supply of housing land.
Query low number of dwellings allocated for site - should be treated as minimum subject to technical assessment.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69508

Received: 28/03/2016

Respondent: Mr Henry Trewren

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

No further consultation has taken place with PC to change number of dwellings.
Housing density brought into question.
-The proposed site contravenes NPPF as it is in a Greenbelt area. This will also impinge on the proposed HS2 rail plan-adding to the known landscape issues.
-Developers may not be able to build dwellings at a reasonable price due to the need to install a complex and substantial drainage system increasing market values and pricing out younger generation.
-There are serious issues with the existing road systems around this area.
-There is a fear that large scale developments around Lillington and Cubbington boundaries may cause Cubbington to lose its identity or even be merged with Leamington.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69512

Received: 15/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Ann Anthony

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

-Not legally compliant as it breaks the green belt rules.
-The local population was not consulted about the H50 sites.
-It is not inline with the previous local plan with a phased introduction of 50 houses at a time.
-Concerned about increased risk of flooding in the existing built up area below H50.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69555

Received: 19/04/2016

Respondent: Elaine Golder

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

-The local plan doesn't make a justifiable case for 'exceptional circumstance' in Cubbington.
-Local plan doesn't address the need for provision of schools/medical facilities which would be an essential part.
-The increased risk of further flood damage to existing properties in Cubbington.
-House building would make B4453 a busy road more difficult to used due to increased traffic.
-Building of 95 homes would only add the difficulties in achieving a landscape which is conducive to the village.
-Also reduction in air quality, increase in air pollution and noise pollution.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69582

Received: 19/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs Jacqueline Bird

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

-Risk of additional flooding to the roads in the village.
-Cubbington's infrastructure would not support the increase in demand for schools, medical surgeries and the additional impact on drainage and sewerage systems.
-It is government policy to protect the greenbelt against development unless exceptional circumstances, but this is not a case of exceptional circumstances.
-Increase in traffic, air pollution on B4453 Rugby road.
-The H50 development, coupled with it's close proximity to the proposed H52, will have a detrimental effect upon the landscape in this area.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69583

Received: 19/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Derek Bird

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

-Risk of additional flooding to the roads in the village.
-Cubbington's infrastructure would not support the increase in demand for schools, medical surgeries and the additional impact on drainage and sewerage systems.
-It is government policy to protect the greenbelt against development unless exceptional circumstances, but this is not a case of exceptional circumstances.
-Increase in traffic, air pollution on B4453 Rugby road.
-The H50 development, coupled with it's close proximity to the proposed H52, will have a detrimental effect upon the landscape in this area.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69587

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Carl Barlow

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

-Building too many houses in a very small area to destroy the village atmosphere.
-The combination of cheap and modern houses will not fit in architecturally with the village and surrounding atmosphere.
The combination of the impact of this development and the adjacent HS2 rail project are cumulatively too much for the village of Cubbington.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69662

Received: 17/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Celia Tandy

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

- no exceptional circumstances demonstrated for loss of green belt
- risk of flooding of susceptible parts of the village will be unacceptably high.
- development will have a detrimental impact on the landscape to the east of Cubbington.
- Increase in traffic at peak periods.
- Insufficient provision for infrastructure to support increased population.
- No medical and parking facilities available.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 69741

Received: 11/04/2016

Respondent: Miss Margaret Cashmore

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to proposed site: -
- land is in green belt and should only be used in exceptional circumstances - not justified in Cubbington
- flooding risk will be increased and will need to be mitigated
- adverse impact on landscape
- increased traffic on Rugby Road - additional congestion
- insufficient provision made for additional services, facilities and infrastructure
- lack of consultation

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Representation ID: 70059

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: CPRE WARWICKSHIRE

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

This location is for housing in the Green Belt. This is not justified and not in accordance with national planning policy. Need for housing will rarely be sufficient to constitute the very special circumstances required for inappropriate development in the Green Belt. The H50 proposals at Cubbington would be a substantial projection of development into pleasant open countryside east of the village.

Full text:

See attached