H44 - North of Milverton

Object

Representation ID: 70200

Received: 19/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs Jean Seton

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Removal of land north of Milverton from the Green Belt is unsound. There are sustainable sites closer to Coventry which have lower green belt value. Leamington will almost be joined to Kenilworth and will undermine the sense of community for both towns. Productive farmland will be lost along with important habitats and an area which is used for recreation. The park and ride scheme will not work as most employment is south of the towns; there is plenty of parking in Leamington, and there will be no dedicated buses.

Object

Representation ID: 70202

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Preeti Gupta

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

No exceptional circumstances exist to remove site from green belt.
Development to support Coventry - sites closer to Coventry available to develop.
Green belt land has value for ecology.
Loss of green lung
Development should take place on non-green belt land.
Development will cause congestion.
Park and ride unsustainable.

Object

Representation ID: 70205

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Miss Vishaka Gupta

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to H44: -
- loss of green open space
- loss of wildlife habitats
- adverse effect on character and amenity of town
- adverse impact on landscape

Object

Representation ID: 70206

Received: 12/04/2016

Respondent: Mr M J Birch

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to H44: -
- exceptional circumstances required by NPPF do not exist to remove land from green belt
- sustainable sites closer to Coventry that should be used in preference to this one
- alternative sites will reduce commuting, congestion and road construction
- loss of productive farmland
- loss of wildlife habitat
- unsustainable park and ride scheme

Object

Representation ID: 70207

Received: 14/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs Susan Hucks

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Exceptional circumstances for the removal of land north of Milverton from the green belt have not been demonstrated.
development would spoil the Old Milverton and Blackdown areas.
The area is well used for recreation.
Coventry's needs should be met in the area immediately adjacent to the City.
the infrastructure to support the housing does not exist. South of the river has more space and is better supported by infrastructure.
This land provides a pleasant entrance to Leamington and helps make it a great place to live

Object

Representation ID: 70208

Received: 14/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Eric Hucks

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Exceptional circumstances for the removal of land north of Milverton from the green belt have not been demonstrated.
development would spoil the Old Milverton and Blackdown areas.
The area is well used for recreation.
Coventry's needs should be met in the area immediately adjacent to the City.
The infrastructure to support the housing does not exist. South of the river has more space and is better supported by infrastructure.
This area form an important part of the entrance in the Leamington and helps make it a pleasant place to live

Object

Representation ID: 70210

Received: 14/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. & Mrs. Douglas & Valerie Burcham

Number of people: 2

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to H44: -
- no evidence of people in Coventry wanting to live in Leamington
- no evidence of demand analysis
- commuting increases congestion
- appropriate sites closer to Coventry
- reuse brownfield sites
- access constrained by congestion on A452, A445; railway
- hard surfaces increase flooding risk
- three alternatives minimise congestion - Thickthorn; between Hatton and A46; north of A46 / SE of A429 junction.
- loss of recreational amenity
- unsustainable park and ride
- "safeguarding" a misnomer; green belt not being preserved
- railway station unfeasible
- lack of detail on sewerage capacity

Object

Representation ID: 70211

Received: 12/04/2016

Respondent: Alan Hingley

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Exceptional circumstances for the removal of land north of Milverton from the green belt have not been demonstrated. There are sustainable sites closer to Coventry which have lower green belt value. Productive farmland will be lost along with important habitats and an area which is used for recreation. the green lung between Kenilworth and Leamington will be reduced, leading a coalescence of the two towns. Use of sites closer to Coventry will reduce unnecessary commuting, road congestion and pollution.
the park and ride is unlikely to be viabale and will not be convenient as it won't have a dedicated bus service. There is also adequate parking in Leamington and the site is located too close to the town. Further the major employers are south of the towns.

Object

Representation ID: 70212

Received: 13/04/2016

Respondent: Barbara Hingley

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Exceptional circumstances for the removal of land north of Milverton from the green belt have not been demonstrated. There are sustainable sites closer to Coventry which have lower green belt value. Productive farmland will be lost along with important habitats and an area which is used for recreation. the green lung between Kenilworth and Leamington will be reduced, leading a coalescence of the two towns. Use of sites closer to Coventry will reduce unnecessary commuting, road congestion and pollution.
the park and ride is unlikely to be viable and will not be convenient as it won't have a dedicated bus service. There is also adequate parking in Leamington and the site is located too close to the town. Further the major employers are south of the towns.

Object

Representation ID: 70213

Received: 09/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs. Carmen Formby

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The proposed park and ride is located too close to Leamington and could then also serve Coventry and Warwick. Further most of the traffic is heading to employment and retail areas south of Warwick

Object

Representation ID: 70214

Received: 06/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Paul Formby

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The proposed park and ride is located too close to Leamington and could then also serve Coventry and Warwick. Further most of the traffic is heading to employment and retail areas south of Warwick

Object

Representation ID: 70236

Received: 19/04/2016

Respondent: Miss Melanie Astell

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposals: -
- exceptional circumstances required by NPPF for allocation of green belt have not been demonstrated
- unlikely that people that work in Coventry will want to live in Milverton
- lower value green belt sites closer to Coventry should be used in preference
- promoting commuting from Milverton to Coventry
- increased traffic congestion
- open space between Leamington and Kenilworth will be lost

Object

Representation ID: 70237

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Mr. Simon Bennett

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Development of land between Leamington and Kenilworth would have a negative impact on both towns' identities.
Rural towns should stay rural and not be allowed to become one sprawling mass.
The farmland identified for use has particular natural beauty with country walks through the middle giving everyone every one the chance to enjoy both wildlife and scenery.
These proposals are not credible at any level and should be rejected without any consideration for approval.
The park and ride is a ludicrous idea; we have ample parking in Leamington town centre.

Object

Representation ID: 70251

Received: 18/04/2016

Respondent: Mr David Bradshaw

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The land north of Leamington should remain in the green belt and Coventry's housing needs can be obtained on land nearer to Coventry; land which has already been identified as suitable.

Object

Representation ID: 70254

Received: 04/04/2016

Respondent: Miss Ruth Buckley

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to proposal: -
- area north of Milverton unsuitable for proposed development as aim Coventry's housing needs rather than Leamington's
- loss of productive agricultural land
- loss of wildlife habitats
- park and ride unnecessary waste of land and money - no demand
- Leamington not large enough to sustain park and ride
-new railway would be too expensive

Object

Representation ID: 70257

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mrs Ann Kelsey

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to allocation: -
- inappropriate location to meet Coventry's needs
- exacerbate commuting
- air quality
- sites of lower green belt value available closer to Coventry
- increase housing density / delivery rate at Kings Heath
- reassess Coventry's own sites
- Nuneaton co-operates with overspill provision
- loss of open space between Leamington and Kenilworth
- adverse impact on landscape, character of area, recreational and sporting activity, heritage, wildlife and habitats
- loss of high quality farmland
- railway station unviable
- park and ride unsustainable

Object

Representation ID: 70270

Received: 21/04/2016

Respondent: Residents Objecting to Development at Milverton 352

Number of people: 352

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Do not support allocation of land north of Milverton for housing