GT08 Depot west side of Cubbington Heath Farm (amber)

Showing comments and forms 31 to 42 of 42

Comment

Preferred Options for Sites

Representation ID: 65167

Received: 08/05/2014

Respondent: CPRE Warwickshire

Representation Summary:

This location is only worth considering if HS2 is built on the line proposed, as it would then be degraded and could be acceptable as a gypsy site.

Full text:

CONSULTATION ON GYPSY & TRAVELLER SITES FOR WARWICK DISTRICT

1. CPRE Warwickshire responded to the Options consultation in 2013. At that stage in the process, CPRE supported two locations in principle, which we considered would meet the practical need for about 25 pitches. These locations were
* Siskin Drive, SE of Coventry (adjacent or close to existing Coventry City Council official site)
* Harbury Lane, at Hobson's Choice (preferably where containers are now stored)

2. These two locations are unfortunately not listed among those put forward during the 2013 consultation. The 2014 Preferred Options consultation document at table 5.1 lists sites stated to have been advanced by respondents in 2013, but neither of these is included in the table. CPRE doubts that the need is for as many as 25 pitches by 2017, as stated by the District Council. Gypsies and travellers often hold land in other Districts, which is not made know in the needs surveys; and there is a risk of double-counting between Districts.

3. The comments on sites below assume this figure of 25 pitches; 30 could be provided if necessary at the locations we suggest.

4. CPRE Warwickshire in summary supports the following locations:

* Hobson's Choice, Harbury Lane, SE of Whitnash 15 pitches
* Siskin Drive, by Coventry Airport, S of Coventry City Council official site 10 pitches
* Birmingham Road, Budbrooke up to 5 pitches
GT04 Land at Harbury Lane/Fosse Way

5. This location is supported and was advanced by CPRE in 2013. We do not support the exact location, which would appear to take over or be alongside Leamington Football Club. This would be an exposed position not easily screened. We support the site on the map extract for GT04 called 'Hobson's Choice'. This is surrounded by a high earth bund, and is used currently for container storage. It lies behind Harbury Lane scrapyard and the old airfield hangar used for indoor go-karting. It would be very suitable for up to 15 pitches and would have no adverse effect on the surrounding environment. As Warwick District Council is willing to consider compulsory purchase of land, this site should be examined closely. The container storage activity need not be at this location and industrial land for it could be found elsewhere.

Siskin Drive, E of Coventry Airport

6. The failure to examine the Siskin Drive area further, and the rejection of it in the 2014 document without explanation, is regrettable. The established existence of the Coventry City Council official site at Siskin Drive, with no adverse environmental or social effects, indicates the general suitability of this area east of Coventry Airport. From the point of view of gypsies and travellers the site is also suitable as it has good road access and does not involve use of minor roads, and there are no private houses nearby. While the local authority boundaries at Siskin Drive are complex (Coventry, Warwick and Rugby all meet here), it should be possible for a Warwick District Council site to be located adjacent to or near the Coventry City Council site.

GT19 Birmingham Road, Budbrooke

7. This has had gypsy occupation in the past. The proximity of other buildings here and the non-agricultural nature of the land adjacent to the A4141 Birmingham Road makes this a potentially acceptable location, but only after the two sites listed above have been developed.


Response on other sites included in the 'Preferred' list (Consultation paper section 9) and on those not supported (Section 10, alternative sites)

GT12 W of Barford Bypass N of Shepham Lane

8. This is open countryside along the western side of the A429 Barford Bypass. It would be very visible, difficult to access and damaging to the setting of Barford. It should be dropped.

Gtalt01 Banbury Road, Warwickshire

9. A gypsy site on the historic road approach to Warwick town centre is not acceptable. This is still a classic rural approach to the historic town. The existing permission for caravans (non-gypsy) and the building of the access does not justify allowing this approach to be degraded by an unattractive and intrusive land use. The site is not being used at present and is better left empty so as to protect the historic approach and the setting of Warwick Castle Park.

GT02 Land at Fosse Way / A425

10. This is a large open landscape, between Radford Hill and North Fosse Farm. It is wholly unsuitable as a gypsy site, being very visible agricultural land. It is partly Grade 3a land and is next to a local wildlife site - the wood known as Parlour Spinney.

GT05 Tachbrook Hill Farm, Bishops Tachbrook

11. This is open farmland between the Banbury Road and Bishops Tachbrook village. With the M40 to the SW, the road is busy with traffic on and off the motorway. The junction between the Banbury Road and Mallory Road is not particularly safe; its rural location makes any junction widening or lighting highly damaging to the character of the immediate area.



Gtalt12 Land SE of Barford Bypass, Barford

12. This appears to have no merit at all as a site. The grounds for objection to GT12 (see above) apply equally to this site.

GT06 Park Farm, Banbury Road, Warwick

13. This is a large area of farmland at Park Farm, on the rural approach to the historic town of Warwick. It would be visible and harm this important setting to Warwick. It would be close to Warwick Castle Park. Similar reasons for objection apply to those listed above for Gtalt01, Banbury Road, Warwick.

GT08 Depot W of Cubbington Heath Farm, Cubbington

14. This location is only worth considering if HS2 is built on the line proposed, as it would then be degraded and could be acceptable as a gypsy site.

GT11 Hampton Road, south of Warwick Racecourse

15. The land north of Henley Road and east of A46 Warwick Bypass is part of Warwick's historic setting. Development of South West Warwick stops at the Henley Road. Urban development should not be allowed to cross it.

GTalt02 Woodyard, Cubbington Road, Rugby Road, Cubbington

16. This would be very harmful to the future of CubbingtonWood, which is replanted Ancient Woodland. The consultation document notes, "North Cubbington Wood is one of the prime cases for woodland restoration for the Princethorpe project which is a complex of woods and hedgerows, currently a Warwickshire Wildlife Trust Living landscape project funded by SITA Trust." A gypsy site here would harm the woodland's restoration and make it less attractive for visitors.

Gtalt03 Henley Road, Hampton-on-the-Hill

17. This site is being promoted by the owner. It would be very harmful to the openness of the Green Belt and to the current rural approach to Warwick from Henley-in-Arden if it were to be developed as a gypsy site. The consultation document fails to describe the appearance of this land or its prominence. It is where the Henley road comes over a crest and Warwick is seen on the skyline. It is too prominent a position to be considered.

Support

Preferred Options for Sites

Representation ID: 65459

Received: 08/05/2014

Respondent: Mrs Patricia Wharton

Representation Summary:

This (or GT11) would be the preferred site.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options for Sites

Representation ID: 65587

Received: 16/04/2014

Respondent: Brian D Parkins

Representation Summary:

Unclear why gypsies and travellers need such a site.

Will adversely impact local children wanting to attend their nearest schools.

There is no bus services serving the site.

Site will have adverse visual impact.

Monitoring and management arrangements for the site are unknown.

How will the landowners be compensated for the loss of their site/income?

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Comment

Preferred Options for Sites

Representation ID: 65594

Received: 12/05/2014

Respondent: Environment Agency

Representation Summary:

Site is underlain by Bromsgrove Sandstone formation, which is a principle aquifer. The site is also within a Source Protection zone 3 for potable water supply borehole. The site is therefore highl;y sensitive in groundwater protection terms.

Previous and current uses are likely to have caused ground contamination. Although there is no objection in principle to development, any application will require detailed investigations to assess the impact of any contamination on ground waters. This will determine the need for a risk assessment and remediation.

Site will need a non- public foul mains sewer solution. Because of the sensitive water environment an additional assessment would be required to assess ground drainage options/risks.

A suitable means of dealing with foul effluent will be required.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options for Sites

Representation ID: 65906

Received: 09/07/2014

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Derek & Jacqueline Bird

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Object on the following grounds:
- the land is owned by a charity which support local worthy causes and its loss would undermine this.
- road safety particularly the crossroads (Stoneleigh Road) which is busy and has safety concerns.
- the site is the green belt
- Additional pressure on local infrastructure and amenities (schools, doctors, hospitals, shops)
- the impact on wildlife
- proximity to HS2 - this area is a potential compound for HS2

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options for Sites

Representation ID: 65911

Received: 04/04/2014

Respondent: Mr Richard M Spicer

Representation Summary:

Site provides sole income of Cubbington Freeholders. Church and Parish have received benefots over recent years from this charity.
Regrettable and would have adverse effect locally is this could not continue

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options for Sites

Representation ID: 65912

Received: 28/04/2014

Respondent: Mr & Mrs A & I J Corley

Representation Summary:

Detrimental to village of Cubbington and residents as the income generates income for local organisations

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options for Sites

Representation ID: 65918

Received: 07/05/2014

Respondent: Saint Mary's Church Mother Union

Representation Summary:

Managed on behalf of village by Cubbington Freeholders, benefits lots of village groups through grants/donations. Loss of site would be loss to community and of a tradition

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options for Sites

Representation ID: 65921

Received: 07/05/2014

Respondent: Saint Mary's Church Members

Representation Summary:

Land managed by Cubbington Freeholders for benefit of village through grants/donations. Loss of benefit to community and of tradition

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options for Sites

Representation ID: 65926

Received: 10/04/2014

Respondent: Cubbington Village Hall Trust

Representation Summary:

Loss of funding to community groups

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Preferred Options for Sites

Representation ID: 66131

Received: 07/04/2014

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Ronald & Christine Walton

Representation Summary:

Strongly object to proposal.
Site awarded to The Cubbington Freeholders in February 1768.
Leased to WCC which provides sole income for charity.
Charity provides funds to community based organisations with parish of Cubbington - over past 11 years grants totalling £121,000 have been made.
Charity vital support for number of groups in local area and future of charity, which has existed for nearly 250 years, would be in doubt.

Full text:

See attached

Object

Preferred Options for Sites

Representation ID: 66132

Received: 02/05/2014

Respondent: Mr J Wright MP

Representation Summary:

Site remote compared to other alternatives.
Potential land and groundwater contamination issues.
Potential impact on protected wildlife.
Proximity to planned HS2 route.
Landowners unwilling to sell so would have to be compulsory purchased.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments: