Potential site capacity of Green and Amber sites
Object
Preferred Options for Sites
Representation ID: 63936
Received: 25/04/2014
Respondent: John Murphy
WDC's intention to limit sites to 10 max is not good and simply serves to BLIGHT more communities. If the reason is to assist management and policing this surely supports residents concerns about these sites and belies the assurances that they can be well managed and Planning Enforced. smallest sites will be uneconomic/unviable to implement - two or at most three larger sites would accommodate the 31 pitches needed
WDC's intention to limit sites to 10 max is not good and simply serves to BLIGHT more communities. If the reason is to assist management and policing this surely supports residents concerns about these sites and belies the assurances that they can be well managed and Planning Enforced. smallest sites will be uneconomic/unviable to implement - two or at most three larger sites would accommodate the 31 pitches needed
Object
Preferred Options for Sites
Representation ID: 64100
Received: 03/05/2014
Respondent: Mrs Chris Murphy
WDC's decision to limit site capacity to 5-10 pitches simply means that more locations will be impacted by these sites. National guidance suggests 5-15 and many of these sites could and should take the maximum and thus impact fewer locations. If smaller numbers are solely to facilitate management it supports the common concern that these sites may be problematic.
WDC's decision to limit site capacity to 5-10 pitches simply means that more locations will be impacted by these sites. National guidance suggests 5-15 and many of these sites could and should take the maximum and thus impact fewer locations. If smaller numbers are solely to facilitate management it supports the common concern that these sites may be problematic.