Map 4: Development Sites - Preferred Options (Urban Fringe)

Object

Representation ID: 49033

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Quadrant Land plc

Agent: Harris Lamb

Map 4 should include Land at Stratford Road in preference to Green Belt options and to enable the Council to meet a requirement of 700 dwellings per annum on allocated sites.

The land is suitable, available and deliverable and there are no physical or environmental reasons to prevent development in principle.

Object

Representation ID: 49035

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Quadrant Land plc

Agent: Harris Lamb

The Green Belt sites on Map 4 should be deleted in favour of non Green Belt opportunities. the Plan has not demonstrated very special circumstances as to why the Green belt sites should be released in favour of non Green Belt options.

Object

Representation ID: 49041

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Quadrant Land plc

Agent: Harris Lamb

Land at Stratford Road, Warwick, identified on the plan shown attached to the response form, has the potential to be used for a variety of employment, commercial and C1/C2/D2 uses and should be allocated for employment purposes. It is well related to the urban area and public transport. There are no physical or environmental reasons which prevent the release of the site in principle.

The site's allocation will support the economic objectives of the Plan and NPPF objectives regarding the economy and the need to release land to meet the needs of the area.

Object

Representation ID: 49192

Received: 26/07/2012

Respondent: The Sundial Group and Gleeson Developments

Number of people: 2

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

If our arguments set out above in relation to Kenilworth are accepted Plan 4 should be amended accordingly to include K17 and AS1b.

Object

Representation ID: 50259

Received: 27/07/2012

Respondent: Stagecoach

Agent: Montagu Evans

Supports comprehensive redevelopment of land at Station Approach including land at the bus depot.

Considers that the plan and the wording of the new local plan preferred options are unclear and requires clarification that the site is allocated for residentital development.

Map 4 only identifies sites as 'development sites', this should be rectified to clarify that the identified sites are allocacted for residential development.

Policy PO4 does not cross-refer to Map 4 therefore it is not clear whether sites on Map 4 (but not in the text of PO4) are allocated for residential development.