Do you support or object to the preferred option for Flood Risk?

Object

Representation ID: 5460

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

Again this makes it sound like an afterthought. It should be part of the Core proposal

Support

Representation ID: 5495

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Illingworth

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5496

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Illingworth

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5558

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5682

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

The area has suffered flooding on numerous occasions over past 14 years and
Urban drainage systems have been found wanting. This should be addressed within all building proposals.

Support

Representation ID: 5734

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5794

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Before any new development takes place the district's existing drainage system needs to be thoroughly sorted out, flood plains should be protected and extended never built on unless it was allowed for allotments use.

Object

Representation ID: 5832

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

Has risk assessment taken place on land proposed for development?

Object

Representation ID: 5951

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 6016

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Harris

Areas identified are under flood risk.

Support

Representation ID: 6054

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 6149

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow

Number of people: 2

Object

Object

Representation ID: 6165

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Barry & Valerie Sankey

Number of people: 2

Poor land drainage in Kings Hill suggests a need for considerable capacity to store and release surface water.

Object

Representation ID: 6232

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Object

Support

Representation ID: 6295

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Support

Object

Representation ID: 6375

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 6470

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

support

Support

Representation ID: 6474

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Stratford and Warwick Waterways Trust

We are always concerned at developments alongside the River Avon but see no specific items in the options that indicate this possibility.

Increased flood risk that may result from development in the catchment area is a concern to ourselves and those on the lower and currently navigable reaches of the river.

Support the requirement of the EA that this risk should be comprehensively mitigated by a sensitive and sustainable approach to drainage schemes.

Recommend the future employment, leisure and environmental opportunities that would be provided by the extension of the Avon Navigation as being complementary to the expansion of population envisaged.

Support

Representation ID: 6755

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

support

Support

Representation ID: 7028

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 7614

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Mr George Jones

Object

Support

Representation ID: 33634

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33699

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr T Steele

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33847

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33892

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Support