Do you support or object to the preferred option for Flood Risk?

Comment

Representation ID: 2722

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

There should be a more pro-active flood management policy involving authorites up stream - do we know that they are acting responsibly? I'd welcome an annual report (by email?) giving clear advice to householders on what to do. Do not allow non-porous paving in any new developments.

Object

Representation ID: 2775

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Flooding has occurred in recent years where it never happened before due to new infrastructure built which has altered the existing environment. This must be recognised and steps taken to avoid building on flood risk areas.

Comment

Representation ID: 2815

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Again, option are in conflict with each other.

Object

Representation ID: 2860

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2899

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 3116

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3245

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

minimise any risk of flooding

Support

Representation ID: 3302

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

I support it.

Support

Representation ID: 3322

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Caroline Martin

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3361

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3423

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3593

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

object

Support

Representation ID: 3730

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Supported.

Object

Representation ID: 3950

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

It seems very clear that you should never build on an area at risk of flooding. You should not build so that it creates flooding in another area.

You have done some risk assessments but have not published the results.As you have not explained your strategy then how can we be expected to support it?

Support

Representation ID: 4114

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

It will need to be a main priority.

Object

Representation ID: 4216

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

Planning for development is considered for areas of high flood risk

Object

Representation ID: 4276

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Kulwinder Fathers

Why has planning for development is considered for areas of high flood risk.

Object

Representation ID: 4415

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: M I Clement

Object to Kings Hill site
Current flooding situation will worsen when development increases run-off and prevents absorbtion.

Support

Representation ID: 4487

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

support

Support

Representation ID: 4572

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Object

Representation ID: 4575

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

See Pitt report, include surface water drainage

Support

Representation ID: 4639

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Support

Representation ID: 4733

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

support

Support

Representation ID: 4904

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5089

Received: 09/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

Qualified SUPPORT:

In considered view the response to thee climate change is the weakest part of the Strategy.

Support

Representation ID: 5179

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

Incomplete: Needs further thought on implementation and sustainability.

Object

Representation ID: 5243

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 5315

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

More conflicting objectives.

Support

Representation ID: 5370

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5422

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

The Kings Hill proposal would be at risk from flooding from Finham Brook.