Do you support or object to the preferred option for Sustainable Buildings, particularly in respect of higher targets for the reduction of carbon emissions?
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5493
Received: 27/09/2009
Respondent: Joanna Illingworth
Support the target. The rest of my answer is as per 19a [There isn't enough on energy conservation or on measures that can be applied to older buildings as opposed to new builds.]
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5555
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan
Number of people: 2
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5681
Received: 20/09/2009
Respondent: Jane Boynton
Targets are too modest and should be increased
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5732
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: Roger Warren
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5792
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Philip Wilson
Having more allotments planned from the start will help reduce carbon emissions in the district. Recycling, water conservation and low or non existent way
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5874
Received: 13/10/2009
Respondent: Pamela Payne
Anything that helps the environment is fantastic and necessary
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 5949
Received: 28/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6052
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Paul Skidmore
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6095
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Stephen Skidmore
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6148
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow
Number of people: 2
Object
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6230
Received: 13/10/2009
Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis
Object
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6293
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Ross Telford
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6373
Received: 18/09/2009
Respondent: John Jessamine
Object.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6468
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: graham leeke
support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6753
Received: 22/09/2009
Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd
Be as sustainable and low CO2 as possible.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 6967
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council
Sustainable Buildings
The use of BREEAM and other Regulatory required standards such as SAP ratings as part of the Building Regulation process will determine the energy ratings of new building and alteration works. As these standards increase due to European commission rules, planning authorities will have to accept new types of building construction and changes in visual appearance of buildings if zero carbon targets are to be met. Renewables in domestic situations are unlikely to give significant quantities of energy because the technology at present does not exist but authorities could fill that gap by initiating and facilitating larger initiatives such as hydropower from the Leam, ground-source heat pumps and industrial waste heat for district heating schemes. The Parish Council believes that all reasonable options have been identified.
However, the reduction target is far too low. Zero carbon should be the goal. Warwick District should set the highest achievable standard for the reduction in energy consumption based on technologies as they are developed It is far easier to reduce energy consumption in a new dwelling. But the biggest problem is the millions of existing buildings that are no where near any standard and there is no programme of retrofitting the necessary works to improve this. The core strategy is an opportunity to make a positive impact on climate change by identifying the poorest performers in the District and including them in a redevelopment programme of some sort compatible with the housing requirements of the RSS. For that reason, we object to the Preferred Option.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7026
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7396
Received: 24/09/2009
Respondent: Europa Way Consortium
Agent: Entec UK Ltd
We note that evidence that will inform a Sustainable Buildings policy is still being prepared. The Consortium believes evidence on the viability of on-site renewable energy targets and Code levels is vital. The Consortium looks forward to responding to this policy at the Draft Core Strategy stage.
The Consortium will aim to provide on-site low carbon, decentralised, or renewable energy sources at Europa Way as part of an integrated scheme following consideration of a range of viability tests at the time of development.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7609
Received: 17/09/2009
Respondent: Mr George Jones
Object
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 7622
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Coal Pension Properties Ltd
Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners
Object, until the sub-regional study is complete it is premature to specify whether standards should be higher or lower. The study should recognise the potential difficulty in providiing renewable or low carbon sources/achieving BREEAM rated buildings within a conservation area or within the vicinity of a listed building. Consideration should be given to exceptions being included in future policy where conservation deem such requirements unfeasible or unviable. In such cases, an open book approach should be adopted.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 33597
Received: 23/09/2009
Respondent: Ray Bullen
Reduction target is far too low. Zero carbon should be goal. WDC should set highest achievable standard for reduction in energy consumption based on technologies as they are developed. Easier to reduce energy consumption in new dwelling. Biggest problem is millions of existing buildings that are nowhere near any standard and there is no programme of retrofitting necessary works to improve. Core strategy is opportunity to make positive impact on climate change by identifying poorest performers in District and including them in redevelopment programme of some sort compatible with the housing requirements of the RSS.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 33697
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Mr T Steele
Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 33742
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Sharba Homes
Agent: PJPlanning
Support
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 33845
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: Gallagher Estates
The Core Strategy should be consistent with the RSS and there may be issues of viability that need to be taken into account on individual sites.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 33890
Received: 25/09/2009
Respondent: A C Lloyd
Agent: Redline
Support