Do you support or object to the preferred option for Sustainable Buildings, particularly in respect of higher targets for the reduction of carbon emissions?

Showing comments and forms 61 to 85 of 85

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5493

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Illingworth

Representation Summary:

Support the target. The rest of my answer is as per 19a [There isn't enough on energy conservation or on measures that can be applied to older buildings as opposed to new builds.]

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5555

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5681

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Representation Summary:

Targets are too modest and should be increased

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5732

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5792

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Representation Summary:

Having more allotments planned from the start will help reduce carbon emissions in the district. Recycling, water conservation and low or non existent way

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5874

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

Representation Summary:

Anything that helps the environment is fantastic and necessary

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 5949

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6052

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6095

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Skidmore

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6148

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Object

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6230

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Representation Summary:

Object

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6293

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6373

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6468

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6753

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

Representation Summary:

Be as sustainable and low CO2 as possible.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 6967

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Sustainable Buildings
The use of BREEAM and other Regulatory required standards such as SAP ratings as part of the Building Regulation process will determine the energy ratings of new building and alteration works. As these standards increase due to European commission rules, planning authorities will have to accept new types of building construction and changes in visual appearance of buildings if zero carbon targets are to be met. Renewables in domestic situations are unlikely to give significant quantities of energy because the technology at present does not exist but authorities could fill that gap by initiating and facilitating larger initiatives such as hydropower from the Leam, ground-source heat pumps and industrial waste heat for district heating schemes. The Parish Council believes that all reasonable options have been identified.
However, the reduction target is far too low. Zero carbon should be the goal. Warwick District should set the highest achievable standard for the reduction in energy consumption based on technologies as they are developed It is far easier to reduce energy consumption in a new dwelling. But the biggest problem is the millions of existing buildings that are no where near any standard and there is no programme of retrofitting the necessary works to improve this. The core strategy is an opportunity to make a positive impact on climate change by identifying the poorest performers in the District and including them in a redevelopment programme of some sort compatible with the housing requirements of the RSS. For that reason, we object to the Preferred Option.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7026

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7396

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Europa Way Consortium

Agent: Entec UK Ltd

Representation Summary:

We note that evidence that will inform a Sustainable Buildings policy is still being prepared. The Consortium believes evidence on the viability of on-site renewable energy targets and Code levels is vital. The Consortium looks forward to responding to this policy at the Draft Core Strategy stage.

The Consortium will aim to provide on-site low carbon, decentralised, or renewable energy sources at Europa Way as part of an integrated scheme following consideration of a range of viability tests at the time of development.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7609

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Mr George Jones

Representation Summary:

Object

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 7622

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Coal Pension Properties Ltd

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners

Representation Summary:

Object, until the sub-regional study is complete it is premature to specify whether standards should be higher or lower. The study should recognise the potential difficulty in providiing renewable or low carbon sources/achieving BREEAM rated buildings within a conservation area or within the vicinity of a listed building. Consideration should be given to exceptions being included in future policy where conservation deem such requirements unfeasible or unviable. In such cases, an open book approach should be adopted.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33597

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Ray Bullen

Representation Summary:

Reduction target is far too low. Zero carbon should be goal. WDC should set highest achievable standard for reduction in energy consumption based on technologies as they are developed. Easier to reduce energy consumption in new dwelling. Biggest problem is millions of existing buildings that are nowhere near any standard and there is no programme of retrofitting necessary works to improve. Core strategy is opportunity to make positive impact on climate change by identifying poorest performers in District and including them in redevelopment programme of some sort compatible with the housing requirements of the RSS.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33697

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr T Steele

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33742

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Sharba Homes

Agent: PJPlanning

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33845

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Representation Summary:

The Core Strategy should be consistent with the RSS and there may be issues of viability that need to be taken into account on individual sites.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 33890

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Representation Summary:

Support