Do you support or object to the preferred option for Sustainable Buildings, particularly in respect of higher targets for the reduction of carbon emissions?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 30 of 85

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 96

Received: 03/07/2009

Respondent: Birmingham International Airport Limited

Representation Summary:

With reference to the sub-regional renewables study, the Council and relevant partner authorities, are reminded of relevant Aerodrome Safeguarding criteria, particularly in respect of Birmingham International Airport (BIA), when investigating options/locations for wind energy (i.e. wind turbines).

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 245

Received: 09/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Duncan Hurwood

Representation Summary:

Seems very good to me, a definite success of the plan.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 387

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 462

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

Representation Summary:

Yes.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 463

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

Representation Summary:

If you build north and south along Harbury Lane another 10,000 vehicles contributing to the emissions coming from the M40 and heavy flow into Europa Way and Technology Park I'm sure would do wonders for the ozone layer.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 515

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Representation Summary:

Higher targets for carbon emissions are advisable.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 586

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 649

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 738

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 809

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 940

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1020

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Cllr Tim Sawdon

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1045

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1112

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1210

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Representation Summary:

Object

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1275

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

Representation Summary:

Do not place houses so far away from facilities that cars have to be used. eg. Warwick Gates residents use cars to take children to school.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1570

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Hamilton

Representation Summary:

Standard is too low!

New building standards could and should be much higher.

BUT also need to incorporate sustainable standards for major refurbishment/ improvements to existing housing stock when planning permission is sort.

HOWEVER to be truly sustainable building design life needs to be longer, I live in 180 year old building, how many new houses and flats will make it to 50 years?
What is the life expectancy of plastic windows/ insulation materials, can they be recycled?

Therefore minimum room and plot size- i.e parker morris- needed if homes are able to meet changing needs over time, and therefore be sustainable!

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1585

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: B.L.A.S.T.

Representation Summary:

Having more allotments planned from the start will help reduce carbon emissions in the district. Recycling, water conservation and low or non existent energy use is the allotment way.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1720

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1796

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1868

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1903

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Representation Summary:

Not sure of preferred option, but increasing the traffic flow not option at all.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1967

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

Representation Summary:

support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2094

Received: 05/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Peter Kerr

Representation Summary:

A sensible approach.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2201

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2351

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2463

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2509

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: British Waterways

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2580

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2658

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Representation Summary:

Higher targets should not be pursued at extra cost. There are other priorities.