Do you support or object to the preferred option for Sustainable Buildings, particularly in respect of higher targets for the reduction of carbon emissions?
Comment
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 96
Received: 03/07/2009
Respondent: Birmingham International Airport Limited
With reference to the sub-regional renewables study, the Council and relevant partner authorities, are reminded of relevant Aerodrome Safeguarding criteria, particularly in respect of Birmingham International Airport (BIA), when investigating options/locations for wind energy (i.e. wind turbines).
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 245
Received: 09/07/2009
Respondent: Mr Duncan Hurwood
Seems very good to me, a definite success of the plan.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 387
Received: 22/07/2009
Respondent: Peter Pounds
Object.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 462
Received: 27/07/2009
Respondent: Peter Clarke
Yes.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 463
Received: 27/07/2009
Respondent: Peter Clarke
If you build north and south along Harbury Lane another 10,000 vehicles contributing to the emissions coming from the M40 and heavy flow into Europa Way and Technology Park I'm sure would do wonders for the ozone layer.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 515
Received: 24/07/2009
Respondent: Georgina Wilson
Higher targets for carbon emissions are advisable.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 586
Received: 27/07/2009
Respondent: Mr A M Webley
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 649
Received: 23/07/2009
Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 738
Received: 10/08/2009
Respondent: P.A. Yarwood
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 809
Received: 05/08/2009
Respondent: Faye Davis
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 940
Received: 19/08/2009
Respondent: Christine Betts
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1020
Received: 24/08/2009
Respondent: Cllr Tim Sawdon
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1045
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Kirit Marvania
Support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1112
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1210
Received: 21/08/2009
Respondent: Barry Elliman
Object
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1275
Received: 24/08/2009
Respondent: Andrew Horsley
Do not place houses so far away from facilities that cars have to be used. eg. Warwick Gates residents use cars to take children to school.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1570
Received: 31/08/2009
Respondent: Mr Nigel Hamilton
Standard is too low!
New building standards could and should be much higher.
BUT also need to incorporate sustainable standards for major refurbishment/ improvements to existing housing stock when planning permission is sort.
HOWEVER to be truly sustainable building design life needs to be longer, I live in 180 year old building, how many new houses and flats will make it to 50 years?
What is the life expectancy of plastic windows/ insulation materials, can they be recycled?
Therefore minimum room and plot size- i.e parker morris- needed if homes are able to meet changing needs over time, and therefore be sustainable!
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1585
Received: 31/08/2009
Respondent: B.L.A.S.T.
Having more allotments planned from the start will help reduce carbon emissions in the district. Recycling, water conservation and low or non existent energy use is the allotment way.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1720
Received: 27/08/2009
Respondent: J.G Whetstone
Object.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1796
Received: 20/08/2009
Respondent: Max Bacon
Object.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1868
Received: 28/08/2009
Respondent: Val Hunnisett
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1903
Received: 31/07/2009
Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham
Not sure of preferred option, but increasing the traffic flow not option at all.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1967
Received: 03/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson
support
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2094
Received: 05/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Peter Kerr
A sensible approach.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2201
Received: 07/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2351
Received: 21/07/2009
Respondent: S B Hoyles
Object.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2463
Received: 08/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Connolly
Object.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2509
Received: 09/09/2009
Respondent: British Waterways
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2580
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson
Number of people: 2
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2658
Received: 14/09/2009
Respondent: John Arnold
Higher targets should not be pursued at extra cost. There are other priorities.