Do you support or object to the preferred option for Inclusive Access?

Comment

Representation ID: 5303

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

The policy as stated is fine but it must be made to happen!

Object

Representation ID: 5359

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

No detail is provided in the Core Strategy Preferred Options Paper

Support

Representation ID: 5411

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: John Baxter

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5451

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

Strategic developments should include consideration of all these issues, and make provision for them to comply with guidelines. This may include defining "accessible locations" within the developments.

Support

Representation ID: 5543

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Number of people: 2

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5589

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5673

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5721

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5863

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: Pamela Payne

When developing services etc it should not be assumed that everyone has access to a car.

Support

Representation ID: 5940

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 6042

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Paul Skidmore

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 6091

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Skidmore

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 6141

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Richard and Judy Swallow

Number of people: 2

Object

Object

Representation ID: 6221

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Object

Support

Representation ID: 6282

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Support

Object

Representation ID: 6364

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 6460

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

Not clear what your preferred options are.

Support

Representation ID: 6744

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

At Milverton New Allotments we are glad that we have blocks of allotments used by Midwarwickshire MIND, and that Ridgeway School is developing a plot to make it suitable for the use of their pupils.

Comment

Representation ID: 6958

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

Inclusive Access
Regional planning guidance requires LAs to improve access and mobility. Future development will exacerbate these issues. The Preferred Options must link new development to improving access and mobility and these must then be detailed in the Draft Core Strategy. There needs to be clarity these infrastructure improvements can be funded by and in tandem with housing and employment land development. Much of this is covered by Part M of the building regulations within buildings, but similar requirements need to be applied to external spaces.

Support

Representation ID: 7017

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Supported

Object

Representation ID: 7598

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Mr George Jones

Object

Support

Representation ID: 33630

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33689

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr T Steele

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Support

Support

Representation ID: 33837

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Support, subject that any new shops as part of new local centres must be viable.