Do you support or object to the preferred option for Inclusive Access?

Support

Representation ID: 2649

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2764

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Support the provision of local centres e.g. community meeting places "built in" to the housing plans, not just "directed" by pointing out the opportunties to local shops and businesses for setting up services.

Object

Representation ID: 2808

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2851

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2890

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Object.

Comment

Representation ID: 3005

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Sounds good on paper.

Object

Representation ID: 3106

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Object

Support

Representation ID: 3236

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

common sense

Support

Representation ID: 3238

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

yes

Support

Representation ID: 3291

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

I support it.

Support

Representation ID: 3343

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3412

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3719

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

I don't believe that all options have been identified (see above).

Support

Representation ID: 3756

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3758

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Support

Comment

Representation ID: 3915

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

Its quite weak and none descriptive. Hard to object to something that says we will build shops and other places and ensure people can get to them! Again if you had linked this to a regeneration approach it could have been really good for this area. Could do better!

Support

Representation ID: 4099

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Yes

Object

Representation ID: 4208

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

This has not been adhered to in deciding the preferred options for development of new housing.

Support

Representation ID: 4380

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: A Picken

Support

Support

Representation ID: 4450

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

support

Support

Representation ID: 4557

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Support

Representation ID: 4626

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Support

Representation ID: 4720

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

support

Object

Representation ID: 4842

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr. Andrew Clarke

Object.

Comment

Representation ID: 4891

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

I am not clear what the preferred options are.

Support

Representation ID: 5001

Received: 08/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

Support

Support

Representation ID: 5066

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5163

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

Local government should not try to Social engineer communities.

Object

Representation ID: 5229

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Object.

Comment

Representation ID: 5266

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

More detail required.