(vii) Land west of Europa Way, Warwick
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1659
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs B Langley
My principle objection to the proposal is the sheer scale of development on the land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury lane and the adjacent area of land west of Europa Way.
Little consideration has been given to infrastructure for such vast amounts of housing. There are already difficulties placed on public service due to existing population and growth.
This will harm the quality of life for a large propotion of the exisiting district.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1692
Received: 27/08/2009
Respondent: J.G Whetstone
Object.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1738
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni
It will drive entrepreneurs out of the area who drive the economy as it willnot be a pleasant area to live work and enjoy.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1766
Received: 20/08/2009
Respondent: Max Bacon
Support.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1829
Received: 28/08/2009
Respondent: Val Hunnisett
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1873
Received: 31/07/2009
Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham
Concerns about traffic generation and lack of infrastructure
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 1942
Received: 03/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson
Absolute disaster for traffic schools and existing residents.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2186
Received: 07/09/2009
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles
Further expansion onto greenfield sites is objected to.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2207
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: The Keefe family
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2211
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: D E Alderson
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2213
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: S P Jones
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2214
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: B & N Blackham and Ellis
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2215
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2216
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2217
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2222
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: G Lane
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2233
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: A B Partridge
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2243
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: Gerrardo Luccio Luccio
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2254
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2264
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: M Weeks
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2274
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Michelle Pye
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2288
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: S Shanahan
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2306
Received: 01/09/2009
Respondent: M Wiles
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2325
Received: 21/07/2009
Respondent: S B Hoyles
Object.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2401
Received: 04/09/2009
Respondent: Roy Standley
No.
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2440
Received: 08/09/2009
Respondent: Mr Connolly
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2479
Received: 08/09/2009
Respondent: Mr D J Bradshaw
Leamington and Warwick are in danger of becoming like a city and any new road network put in to serve the new development will be of no help to the congestion in Leamington and Warwick.
The area of Warwick Gates/Whitnash has had enough development.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2536
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Kay Cugini
Overdevelopment already with Trinity Site, Warwick Gates, traffic gridlock, Lidl site, there is no more room for growth without total infrastructure overhaul, local schools over subscribed, erosion of green belt and serious flood risk to existing properties through further development, loss of area identity
Support
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2625
Received: 14/09/2009
Respondent: John Arnold
Support.
Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 2687
Received: 10/09/2009
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt
No, leave a lung for the south town.