(vii) Land west of Europa Way, Warwick

Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 756

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1659

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs B Langley

Representation Summary:

My principle objection to the proposal is the sheer scale of development on the land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury lane and the adjacent area of land west of Europa Way.

Little consideration has been given to infrastructure for such vast amounts of housing. There are already difficulties placed on public service due to existing population and growth.

This will harm the quality of life for a large propotion of the exisiting district.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1692

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1738

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Representation Summary:

It will drive entrepreneurs out of the area who drive the economy as it willnot be a pleasant area to live work and enjoy.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1766

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1829

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1873

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Representation Summary:

Concerns about traffic generation and lack of infrastructure

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1942

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

Representation Summary:

Absolute disaster for traffic schools and existing residents.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2186

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Representation Summary:

Further expansion onto greenfield sites is objected to.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2207

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Keefe family

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2211

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: D E Alderson

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2213

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: S P Jones

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2214

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: B & N Blackham and Ellis

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2215

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2216

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2217

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2222

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: G Lane

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2233

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: A B Partridge

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2243

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Gerrardo Luccio Luccio

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2254

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2264

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: M Weeks

Representation Summary:


We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2274

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Michelle Pye

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2288

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: S Shanahan

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2306

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: M Wiles

Representation Summary:

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2325

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2401

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

Representation Summary:

No.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2440

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2479

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr D J Bradshaw

Representation Summary:

Leamington and Warwick are in danger of becoming like a city and any new road network put in to serve the new development will be of no help to the congestion in Leamington and Warwick.
The area of Warwick Gates/Whitnash has had enough development.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2536

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Kay Cugini

Representation Summary:

Overdevelopment already with Trinity Site, Warwick Gates, traffic gridlock, Lidl site, there is no more room for growth without total infrastructure overhaul, local schools over subscribed, erosion of green belt and serious flood risk to existing properties through further development, loss of area identity

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2625

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 2687

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Representation Summary:

No, leave a lung for the south town.