(vii) Land west of Europa Way, Warwick

Support

Representation ID: 129

Received: 06/07/2009

Respondent: R A Chapleo

Support

Support

Representation ID: 193

Received: 11/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Alexander Holmes

I support all the suggested options as they focus housing on areas best able to accommodate new development, without encroaching on the Green Belt.

Object

Representation ID: 215

Received: 03/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Baxter

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 266

Received: 10/07/2009

Respondent: Patricia Robinson

Totally object too. Will infill area between Warwick and Leamington. Number of houses is ridiculous and roads won't be able to cope with extra cars.

Object

Representation ID: 304

Received: 17/07/2009

Respondent: Mr David Higgin

No infrastructure to support these houses, lack of school spaces, encroaching on green spaces, traffic levels are already unacceptable in this area during commuting times.

Object

Representation ID: 334

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D Bolam

No infrastructure to support such buiding, schools alrady full, traffic in and around the area at peak times is horrendous. Would completely merge Warwick with Leamington.

Object

Representation ID: 362

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 410

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Ian Clarke

Appropriate location with good transport links and close amenities

Object

Representation ID: 440

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

To put 4200 houses along these areas opposite Warwick Gates would put too much of a stranglehold on the area in pollution; too heavy road traffic, schools could not cope with the influx; NHS would not cope. You would cause another town between Warwick and Whitnash. In short it would be a monumental cock up.

Support

Representation ID: 491

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 562

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 625

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 713

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Infrastructure inadequate.

Support

Representation ID: 714

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Support with good design.

Support

Representation ID: 785

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 853

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

Object, not necessary, infrastucture cannot support this plus environmental damage

Object

Representation ID: 891

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Matthew Horsman

I live next to the land west of europa way, I of course object to a new large housing estate on this site.

We should be building on more brown sites as was the publicly endorsed option 5 last year. Not this new preferred plan which destroys this area of restraint.

I came to warwick and paid a high amount of money for the location and quality of life in our great town. Creating these monsterous estates and the impact on sewage, schools and traffic is a disgrace.

Proven by the incompentence of the delegates at the public meeting on Mon17thAug.

Object

Representation ID: 917

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

The area of Harbury Lane / Whitnash cannot support more housng in terms of roads, schooling (which is currently not sufficient anyway) medical/policing etc. Plus section 10.36 of 50% of affordable housing will be too high. warwick gates residents are against this - a balance yes but not 50%.

Object

Representation ID: 944

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: ms karen hancock

Leamington and Warwick roads are already congested enough without further development in this area. School places and NHS resourses are also already stretched. Why can't the building and therefore the burdens be shared across the district- rather than adding further to the massive development already seen in this area in the last few years?

Support

Representation ID: 998

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Support

Support

Representation ID: 1084

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Limited. Connected to local employment.

Object

Representation ID: 1122

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Better used as commercial, as it sits between two existing commercial areas.

Support

Representation ID: 1185

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Support

Object

Representation ID: 1242

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

Land owned by charities set up to enhance education of children. Selling land for houses = increased pressure of schools, therefore selling of land not justified.

Also see comment for Woodside Farm housing location option.

Object

Representation ID: 1309

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

Charities owning land will create pressue on school numbers when they are supposed to enhance the local schools.

Object

Representation ID: 1458

Received: 23/08/2009

Respondent: Judith Burdon

Object to proposed housing development due to lack of infrastructure in recent housing developments (Warwick Gates). Particularly schooling, which has resulted in children travelling across Warwick at peak times to attend school.

Traffic will worsen if development goes ahead making it more difficult, if forced to take children to a school several miles from their home.

Object

Representation ID: 1462

Received: 25/08/2009

Respondent: David Burdon

There is insufficient jobs in the district to support the proposed housing development.

Infrastructure in the district will not cope, including Warwick Hospital, and traffic.

Increased risk of flooding.

Object

Representation ID: 1516

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Hamilton

This seems a very hire number in this location

Object

Representation ID: 1539

Received: 29/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Mark Roberts

Current traffic is at a stand still at peak times into Leamington - this will add to the traffic issues. Warwick gates residents can't get kids into local schools now!

Object

Representation ID: 1639

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

Again, my comments under the Employment headiing apply here, plus 1250 homes will generate 6,875 further journeys daily onto Europa Way/ Gallows Hill etc.
Surely Planners and Engineers must know the effects in view of the plea from the Engineers for the public views to overcome congestion when Warwick Gates was developed!!