(v) Land at Woodside Farm, north of Harbury Lane, Whitnash

Object

Representation ID: 1446

Received: 17/08/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

The proposed use of Woodside Farm will create a further 1375 daily trips into and out of this area alone.

Infrastructure will not be able to cope with this development and local people are concerned about the egress and access to the site from existing residential streets.

Object

Representation ID: 1453

Received: 03/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs S Dahlison

Objects to the proposed housing at land south of Harbury Lane.
Objects to the large housing numbers at this location without benefit of any infrastructure. This would would lead to more car trips and lead to more pollution, further pressure on overburdened existing infrastructure, eg roads, doctors surgeries, shops.

The other brown field sites area availabe. WDC has a site near Coventry which could be used which is more appropriate.

Object

Representation ID: 1635

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

250 dwellings in this one area alone will introduce a further 275 vehicles ont the road (1375 added journeys daily). Query spilling onto Landor Road/ Ashford Rd with limited access onto Tachbrook Rd or onto Harbury Lane ( already quequeing at peak times.

Object

Representation ID: 1690

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1736

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Rural life/quality of life has already been majorily affected negatively through the development of Warwick Gates.

Support

Representation ID: 1757

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Lord sunder sandher

Good for local business.

Object

Representation ID: 1761

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Harbury Lane is a danger zone. It can take several minutes to exit Heathcote Park. Traffic and pollution will worsen.

Existing schools and healtcare and sewers will be unable to cope.

Support

Representation ID: 1828

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1908

Received: 02/09/2009

Respondent: Miss K A Hattersley

Development at Woodside Farm will detract from the Mallory Hotel and along Harbury Lane will spoil the countryside and impact on the village of Bishop's Tachbrook.

Object

Representation ID: 1940

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

Leave some green somewhere

Object

Representation ID: 1992

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: K A Ferguson

On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodatehousing needs over the next 18 years.

Object

Representation ID: 2006

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: A. J Daubnley

On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses

proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodat housing needs over the next 18

years.

Object

Representation ID: 2017

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses

proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of

life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodat housing needs over the next 18

years.

Object

Representation ID: 2027

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: G Pritchard

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates. Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 2109

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: J Wenzel

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 2125

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 2153

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: D E Alderson

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 2174

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 2184

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Further expansion onto greenfield sites is objected to.

Object

Representation ID: 2208

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Keefe family

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 2224

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: G Lane

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 2234

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: A B Partridge

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 2246

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Gerrardo Luccio Luccio

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 2256

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: The Occupier

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 2267

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: M Weeks

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 2290

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: S Shanahan

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 2308

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: M Wiles

Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.

Object

Representation ID: 2323

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2399

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

No.

Support

Representation ID: 2438

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Support.