(v) Land at Woodside Farm, north of Harbury Lane, Whitnash

Support

Representation ID: 127

Received: 06/07/2009

Respondent: R A Chapleo

Support

Object

Representation ID: 174

Received: 11/07/2009

Respondent: Mr David Jordan

Already not enogh spaces in the local Whitnash schools for the extra children that have come from Warwick Gates. How will building the extra houses at woodside farm and south of Harbury Lane help that situation. Infastructure just does not exist to support this development. People like Whitnash because in just a few minutes you can be in open countryside, how does making it the centre of a huge housing estate contrbute to that.

Support

Representation ID: 191

Received: 11/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Alexander Holmes

I support all the suggested options as they focus housing on areas best able to accommodate new development, without encroaching on the Green Belt.

Object

Representation ID: 213

Received: 03/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Baxter

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 264

Received: 10/07/2009

Respondent: Patricia Robinson

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 295

Received: 14/07/2009

Respondent: Leamington and County Golf Club

We object to any land for development that is adjacent or part of Leamington and County Golf Club, Golf Lane Whitnash or any developments to the north and east of Harbury Lane upto Tachbrook Road. Tresspass and potential damage being the main reasons.

Object

Representation ID: 300

Received: 17/07/2009

Respondent: Mr David Higgin

No infrastructure to support these houses, lack of school spaces, encroaching on green spaces, traffic levels are already unacceptable in this area during commuting times.

Comment

Representation ID: 307

Received: 17/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila Smith

The three developments of Europa Way, Woodside Farm and the land South of Harbury Lane will result in severe traffic problems. The suggestion of using these areas has been made with benefit of a traffic survey. Schools, bus services and health centres will be put under considerable strain. The conurbation of Warwick/Whitnash/Leamington will be even larger and thus less pleasant. Extra traffic will cause worse air pollution. The use of such a large swathe of green belt goes against the council's own vision for the area.

Object

Representation ID: 308

Received: 17/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila Smith

The three developments of Europa Way, Woodside Farm and the land South of Harbury Lane will result in severe traffic problems. The suggestion of using these areas has been made with benefit of a traffic survey. Schools, bus services and health centres will be put under considerable strain. The conurbation of Warwick/Whitnash/Leamington will be even larger and thus less pleasant. Extra traffic will cause worse air pollution. The use of such a large swathe of green belt goes against the council's own vision for the area.

Object

Representation ID: 332

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D Bolam

No infrastructure to support such building. Insuffient school places at present, traffic in and around the area at times horrendous.

Object

Representation ID: 360

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 408

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Ian Clarke

Suitable location for housing

Object

Representation ID: 438

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

To put 4200 houses along these areas opposite Warwick Gates would put too much of a stranglehold on the area in pollution; too heavy road traffic, schools could not cope with the influx; NHS would not cope. You would cause another town between Warwick and Whitnash. In short it would be a monumental cock up.

Support

Representation ID: 489

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 559

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 623

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 712

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Support, however access from Warwick Gates to playing fields must be included.

Support

Representation ID: 783

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 851

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

Object, not necessary, infrastucture cannot support this plus environmental impact

Object

Representation ID: 885

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Mr J C Booth

No regard for cost of effects on infra structure

Object

Representation ID: 915

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

The area of Harbury Lane / Whitnash cannot support more housng in terms of roads, schooling (which is currently not sufficient anyway) medical/policing etc.

Support

Representation ID: 994

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Support

Support

Representation ID: 1082

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Limited. Connected to local employment.

Support

Representation ID: 1119

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Small development area which if done nicely, could link the Harbury Lane recreational area/playing fields much better to the community. Logical infill.

Object

Representation ID: 1183

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Object

Object

Representation ID: 1240

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

Area of restraint. Inspector report relatively recent following an enquiry. Nothing has changed. Valuable agricultural land- strong opposition from local community. Insufficient local facilities - schools, shops, health. Roads choked already from Warwick Gates residents travelling into Whitnash to schools. Local children cannot get places at local schools. Already a recent concentrations of houses at Warwick Gates. Further building in this area would put additional pressure on a community that has been adveresly affected by this high density development.

Object

Representation ID: 1307

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

Take notice of the area of restraint. Still same criteria: Good farmland, steep land , no roads to access safely, no school places, too much traffic coming throught into Whitnash. Roads very narrow and choked at school times. Too many strangers.

Object

Representation ID: 1407

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs John and Mary Fletcher

Number of people: 2

Object to the development which will overload existing struggling infrastructure. The construction of 2500 houses will lead to destruction of Tachbrook Valley, loss of countryside, overcrowded services and overburdened infrastructure. Loss of character and distinctiveness of area.

Support the need for more housing but only in sustainable location which protect the greenbelt

Object

Representation ID: 1423

Received: 26/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs N&M Woods

Number of people: 2

Proposing housing will overload existing services/ infrastructure, unacceptable loss of rural landscapes, loss of distinctiveness and character of Whitnash and Bishops Tachbrook.

Object

Representation ID: 1445

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: K Dorning

Considers that the Core Strategy would cause irrevocable damage to the character of Bishops Tachbrook Questions the need to put housing on land south of Harbury Lane when there is land at Finham
Concerns about the ability of the existing infrastructure to cope with housing in this location on this scale.