Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing a mix of new housing?

Support

Representation ID: 3172

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 3278

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

Having lived in a mix of new housing in Castle Bromwich Birmingham. New private houses, built side by side with Council or Housing Associations
was a failure.

Support

Representation ID: 3313

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Caroline Martin

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3327

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Support

Representation ID: 3370

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Christopher Gibb

But to make this work it is essential to have at least a primary school in the new 2500 dwelling area. This helps to create community, which Warwick Gates does not currently have.

Support

Representation ID: 3403

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3463

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr P Dimanbro

All homes shouild be low cost.

Object

Representation ID: 3478

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs E. Appleby

Object

Object

Representation ID: 3569

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

object

Object

Representation ID: 3673

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Keay

object

Object

Representation ID: 3709

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Our land is now a precious commodity and that we should seek to use it sparingly and optimise its use. I would prefer to see exactly what the policies are, rather than being told that the Core Strategy must include some!

Object

Representation ID: 3876

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Patricia Diane Freeman

Yes - Any other place than Finahm and traffic congestions.

Object

Representation ID: 3905

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

The definition of the mix does not include sustainability issues, the impact of the urban heat island, sustainable water management, building for life considerations. It just seems to be a brochure for developers to build the same styles as on Warwick Gates and Chase Meadow - which are no longer appropriate. Considering the number of strategies that are missing from this consultation, the council is hardly capable of deciding the mix of housing with so much missing information and lack of best practice advice.

Support

Representation ID: 3960

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr John Archer

It is appropriate to secure a specific mix of housing in order to more directly meet the needs identified in local housing markets and through housing need surveys

Object

Representation ID: 3987

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr M Abba

For a mix of housing types it is not necessary to build a large development. The planners just need to ensure tht there is a mix across the available development sites, which should be evenly distributed across the county.

Support

Representation ID: 4062

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

Support the need for a range of housing including family homes with a garden and starter houses for couples and supported accommodation for the elderly or those with accessibility needs.

Support

Representation ID: 4074

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Broadly support, but large housing estates are not always the pleasantest places to live, or the easiest to develop any community spirit - not good for the elderly you want to put there.

Support

Representation ID: 4254

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

Support if extra shops, post officees, schools etc are included.

Comment

Representation ID: 4266

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Kulwinder Fathers

Not really

Support

Representation ID: 4373

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: A Picken

Conditionally- Would Depend on types of affordable housing ie small houses or blocks of flats & planning

Support

Representation ID: 4544

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Object

Representation ID: 4604

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

Proportion of assisted housing is too high and will reduce the viability of developers.

Object

Representation ID: 4709

Received: 23/10/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

Any land available ( not green belt) should have a mix

Object

Representation ID: 4832

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr. Andrew Clarke

As previously stated the plans show no desire to use all land currently available without making further in roads into green belt land

Support

Representation ID: 4874

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 4965

Received: 08/10/2009

Respondent: Mr Graham Harrison

It is crucial that future housing development meets NEEDS - not DEMANDS

Support

Representation ID: 5054

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5146

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

We already have too many deprived areas; these should be rejuvenated in situ. There is already a good mixture of housing types (prices) in the area so the mix is a false argument. People should be allowed to live where they like without councils trying to "social engineer" their own problems away. Aspiration is a major motivator in community, wealth and responsibility development if people want to live with their peers let them.

Object

Representation ID: 5241

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Lindsay Wood

object

Support

Representation ID: 5287

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

I support the need for a policy which provides a mix of housing types but do not believe that large housing sites are the only way of achieving this objective.