Do you support or object to the preferred option for securing a mix of new housing?

Object

Representation ID: 1696

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1741

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Object

Support

Representation ID: 1769

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1839

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1879

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Need some but more careful planning required.

Support

Representation ID: 1945

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

support

Support

Representation ID: 1946

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

support

Support

Representation ID: 1979

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Ken Hope

(10.c) Very important, particularly in the rural areas

Object

Representation ID: 2189

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Higher densities, 10.39, are detrimental to the living standards of residents, forcing families to live in rooms smaller that most European homes.

Comment

Representation ID: 2190

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

30% proportion would be preferred in the present economic downturn, to be reviewed when circumstances change.

Support

Representation ID: 2327

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2404

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

Yes.

Object

Representation ID: 2442

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Object.

Comment

Representation ID: 2534

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Margrave

A mix is required, but ensure all house sizes are of reasonable size rather than too many high density boxes. Don't let developers change plans for a site to different houses once committed.

Object

Representation ID: 2559

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

A mixture of housing on the same site is unattractive and should, if at all possible be built on separate sites.

Support

Representation ID: 2629

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Essential.

Object

Representation ID: 2636

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr James Delaney

Developers redeveloping existing brownfield sites typically build flats to maximise profit per square footage of land. As such, any new developments must concentrate on larger family houses - only new developments would have space for large gardens.

Object

Representation ID: 2672

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Maisey

Strongly object to any development in Warwickshire.

Comment

Representation ID: 2688

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

To a degree but the balance of local services (small shops etc) are equally important.

Support

Representation ID: 2752

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

A mix of similar proportions according to the age and social profiles of the population should be applied to all new housing settlements.

Comment

Representation ID: 2796

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Only brownfield sites.

Support

Representation ID: 2840

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2879

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2908

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: ALISON ELFWOOD

UNREALISTIC

Support

Representation ID: 2939

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 2959

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs. penny Spooner

If the council needs to release greenfield sites then this is a suitable location providing the woods are maintained.

Object

Representation ID: 2990

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

This is a loaded question

Support

Representation ID: 3049

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Katharine Whigham

With the need for more family sized homes, I recognise that larger developments are more suited to addressing this need

Support

Representation ID: 3094

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3163

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.C Hadfield

Only on brown fields sites.