Do you support or object to the preferred option for the density of new housing?

Support

Representation ID: 33621

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Agent: Savills (L&P) Ltd

Supports the flexible approach to density being promoted and notes that this will place a greater emphasis on the quality, design, and placemaking of proposed layouts.

Object

Representation ID: 33722

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr John Burman

Agent: Bigwood Associates Ltd

A fuller range of housing sites should be identified without the need for reliance upon windfalls.

Support

Representation ID: 33734

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Sharba Homes

Agent: PJPlanning

Provided the national minimum density continues to be applied except in exceptional circumstances. A range of densities to suit context is entirely appropriate.

Support

Representation ID: 33764

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Shirley Estates

Agent: Davis Planning Partnership

Flexible approach can reflect local site identities and characteristics.

Support

Representation ID: 33829

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Gallagher Estates

Flexibility on density is important to allow designers to respond to site specific issues.

Comment

Representation ID: 33883

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: A C Lloyd

Agent: Redline

Density needs to respond to site circumstances.

Support

Representation ID: 33930

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Kenilworth Town Council

Supports preferred option

Object

Representation ID: 33965

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Louis Balestrini

Object.More high density housing means more infrastructure schools roads ,etc.