Do you support or object to the preferred option for the density of new housing?

Object

Representation ID: 1743

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Object

Support

Representation ID: 1771

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1842

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1881

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Not density. Have all present developments been taken into account, including Warwick Gates?

Object

Representation ID: 2056

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: mr john jacques

because it is based on biased unproven numbers provided by New Labour to suit own ends in getting relected, to get votes from mass of welfare dependent unemployed/unemployable hangers-on it has created in 11 years of mismanagement.

Object

Representation ID: 2191

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Emphasis must be placed on providing quality housing for residents whether in towns or villages and local communities consulted about possible housing development plans.

Support

Representation ID: 2329

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2406

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

No.

Object

Representation ID: 2444

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Object.

Comment

Representation ID: 2535

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Margrave

Since this we live in the real world.
The density of all house builds should allow for a minimum of two allocated parking spaces or preferrably on property parking for two normal size cars.

Object

Representation ID: 2561

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Number of people: 2

Believe that over expansion of the area would be detrimental to the character of the district and its attractiveness as a residential area. Tourism could also be affected.

Support

Representation ID: 2631

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Comment

Representation ID: 2690

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Consider the continental system of courtyard development particularly for the elderley - a well maintained central garden surrounded by 2 storey (max. 3 storey) maisonettes with a resident "concierge's" flat at the entrance. Gives people security.

Support

Representation ID: 2754

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Focus on re-using brownfield sites for housing and on assuming more will be available due to the recession rather than identifying greenfield sites for development keep a balabce in type of houses with gardens for familieis and smaller units for singles.

Object

Representation ID: 2798

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

These are impossible.

Object

Representation ID: 2842

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2881

Received: 11/09/2009

Respondent: Susan Butcher

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 2910

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: ALISON ELFWOOD

IT'S CRIMINAL TO SQUASH THE MAXIMUM AMMOUNT OF HOUSING IN A SPACE. WE NEED GREEN BELT, OPEN SPACES, NATURE.

Support

Representation ID: 2941

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

We support the concept of a range of densities which should provide a range of sizes and costs to meet varied needs and improve the overall appearance, balance and environment of any new developments.

Support

Representation ID: 2961

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs. penny Spooner

yes

Object

Representation ID: 2992

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

This is a loaded question

Support

Representation ID: 3050

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Katharine Whigham

I strongly support the use of brownfield sites where this is ppropriate

Object

Representation ID: 3096

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

A greater emphasis must be made on green recreation areas within new housing developments.

Object

Representation ID: 3169

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.C Hadfield

Object

Support

Representation ID: 3174

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

We support the concept of a range of densities which should provide a range of sizes and costs to meet varied needs and improve the overall appearance, balance and environment of any new developments.

Object

Representation ID: 3280

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

As above 10d

Object

Representation ID: 3315

Received: 17/09/2009

Respondent: Caroline Martin

I object - density should be less.

Support

Representation ID: 3329

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Object

Representation ID: 3481

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs E. Appleby

Object

Comment

Representation ID: 3528

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Horsley

Higher density on old Ford Foundry site