Do you support or object to the preferred option for Tourism, particularly in respect of visitor accommodation?

Support

Representation ID: 4029

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Yes.

Support

Representation ID: 4361

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: A Picken

Support

Support

Representation ID: 4524

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Support

Representation ID: 4589

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Support

Representation ID: 4662

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

Good idea to protect the existing tourist accommodation.

Support

Representation ID: 4860

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Vera Leeke

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5036

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Michael Morris

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5122

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Barry Betts

Visiors come to Warwick based on its historic past. The developments proposed are nothing to do with supporting visitor accommodation(!) If Warwick want visitors then mass development would be bad.

Object

Representation ID: 5195

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Sonia Owczarek

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 5279

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: J. N. Price

Existing visitor accommodation in the district and nearby must be given all possible support. In particular, 'regulation with a light touch' should become the norm for smaller establishments to avoid the burdens of bureaucracy becoming a significant cost in their operation.

Support

Representation ID: 5333

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: SEAN DEELY

But I am very disappointed that this is the only strategy being proposed.

Support

Representation ID: 5433

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mike Cheeseman

But the reality is that it (the accommodation) will be provided if it is commercially viable and not if it isn't.

Comment

Representation ID: 5472

Received: 27/09/2009

Respondent: Joanna Illingworth

The preferred option does not have a clear policy on visitor accommodation, so one cannot agree or disagree with it.

Support

Representation ID: 5572

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: George Martin

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5647

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Jane Boynton

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 5693

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Roger Warren

excessive tourism has ruined - e.g. Oxford and Stratford, and brought residents no advantages. Do we want this here?

Support

Representation ID: 5756

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Philip Wilson

Gardens both in the parks, historical locations and private, are a source of great tourist attraction to the district we must maintain and encourage our residents to get involved and develop even more attractions for the tourists that involve gardening - the project for the Pump Room Gardens is a good example. A living, working allotment in one of the parks would be a good idea as an incentive for people to try

Support

Representation ID: 5807

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Alison Cox

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5907

Received: 28/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Alan Roberts

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 5988

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Harris

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 6153

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Barry & Valerie Sankey

Number of people: 2

Although not directly related to tourism, the development will lead to a built up area spreading through Hinckley/ Coventry/Kenilworth, Warwick & Stratford, thus harming the tourist's perception of leafy Warwickshire.

Object

Representation ID: 6181

Received: 13/10/2009

Respondent: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Object

Support

Representation ID: 6249

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ross Telford

Support

Object

Representation ID: 6307

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Cheatle

Object

Object

Representation ID: 6331

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: John Jessamine

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 6434

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: graham leeke

support

Support

Representation ID: 6685

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

support

Comment

Representation ID: 6710

Received: 05/11/2009

Respondent: Warwickshire County Council - Heritage & Culture (Museums)

The importance of historic assets to tourism is recognised; it would be helpful if the text were also to recognise that the ambience of the District's Historic Landscapes will be a significant factor in attracting visitors to the District.
Suggest that mention is made of Green Tourism as a major influence, with its association with Shakespeare plus aesthetic qualities of the Forest of Arden and Arden Parklands e.g. Warwick Castle Parklands and Warwickshire's leafy country lanes.

Object

Representation ID: 6931

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

Tourism
The Parish Council don‟t believe that the Council has identified all the reasonable alternatives. With tourism being such an important part of the local economy and yet with significant untapped potential, The Parish Council is very concerned that the limit of the recommendations within the core strategy document is the proposal to protect tourist accommodation. To support tourism it is essential to keep and enhance the Warwickshire countryside. Although the historic parts are important, the rolling landscape is totally attractive including the way that it rolls up to the sharp change at urban boundaries. To allow Leamington to sprawl southwards and spoil views from Warwick Castle Towers will not enhance the visitor experience.
With respect to the Preferred Option, the Parish Council is disappointed that this is the only strategy being proposed.

Support

Representation ID: 6990

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

When tourist ask you where are the shops meaning other than charity shops, what can you say in Warwick?