Do you support or object to the preferred option for Tourism, particularly in respect of visitor accommodation?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 30 of 97

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 118

Received: 06/07/2009

Respondent: R A Chapleo

Representation Summary:

Agreed - the core business of the District is tourism

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 147

Received: 06/07/2009

Respondent: R Clipson

Representation Summary:

Existing visitor accommodation should be protected and more should be encouraged. Good quality B & B are essential for the tourist industry.
This should include public houses which should not be allowed to be bought up by supermarkets to create even more units, taking trade from existing local retailers.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 185

Received: 11/07/2009

Respondent: Mr Alexander Holmes

Representation Summary:

Tourism is fundamentally important to the District's economy. This is not just about development, it is also about proactive marketing and promotion. The historic town centres are a major draw, but we lack distinctive town centre accommodation. I would support a policy which seeks to protect a reduction in town centre accommodation, unless it can be proven that it is genuinely no longer viable, or of inadequate quality.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 256

Received: 10/07/2009

Respondent: Patricia Robinson

Representation Summary:

No further development needed.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 323

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D Bolam

Representation Summary:

A sensible approach.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 350

Received: 22/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Pounds

Representation Summary:

No.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 428

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Peter Clarke

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 479

Received: 24/07/2009

Respondent: Georgina Wilson

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 549

Received: 27/07/2009

Respondent: Mr A M Webley

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 611

Received: 23/07/2009

Respondent: Mr G.R. Summers

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 702

Received: 10/08/2009

Respondent: P.A. Yarwood

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 773

Received: 05/08/2009

Respondent: Faye Davis

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 841

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Adrian Farmer

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 905

Received: 19/08/2009

Respondent: Christine Betts

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 971

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Kirit Marvania

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 989

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Cllr Tim Sawdon

Representation Summary:

Support.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1071

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Representation Summary:

Support.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1086

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Representation Summary:

The suggestion that lack of overnight accommodation limits overnight stays is pure speculation. The central location and good transport links have made the area very easy to reach as a day trip destination. Lack of demand has resulted in the closure of more than one Leaminton hotel since the M40 was opened.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1173

Received: 21/08/2009

Respondent: Barry Elliman

Representation Summary:

Support

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1231

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

Representation Summary:

Yes

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1295

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1364

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association

Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants

Representation Summary:

Support

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1479

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Kundi

Number of people: 2

Representation Summary:

Object.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1511

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Mr Nigel Hamilton

Representation Summary:

More vision in tourism needed. Budget Chain Hotel will damage the tourism economy.

Comment

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1545

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs David and Heather Hall

Representation Summary:

Where appropriate, existing visitor accommodation should be allowed to be changed to mixed use to suit local market conditions.

The building of new visitor accommodation would be desirable where there is a lack of local guest accommodation in and around villages and other rural areas.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1558

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: B.L.A.S.T.

Representation Summary:

7b Gardens both in the parks, historical locations and private, are a source of great tourist attraction to the district we must maintain and encourage our residents to get involved and develop even more attractions for the tourists that involve gardening - the project for the Pump Room Gardens is a good example. A living, working allotment in one of the parks would be a good idea as an incentive for people to try.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1626

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

Representation Summary:

Again, impossible with overall sprawl of accommodation within and outside the towns. Previously hotels have been turned into flats etc.

Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1677

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Representation Summary:

Object.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1726

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

Representation Summary:

Yes, as this will bring an income to local shops who have been failed through lack of support by the Council.

Support

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 1783

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Representation Summary:

Support.