(iv) Land at Kings Hill, south of Green Lane, Finham

Object

Representation ID: 2972

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Strongly object to this land being used other than the high yield arable land that it already is - also Alvis Sports Ground is beneficial to the
junior, youth and senior sports at houses - also Leasowes Garden Nursery employs only handicapped and disabled young people.

Object

Representation ID: 3029

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Rhyan Barry

Eroding farmland is not the way forward.

Support

Representation ID: 3059

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Alison Oliver

Good road connections

Support

Representation ID: 3075

Received: 17/09/2000

Respondent: Mr Anthony Morris

This area must be used by Warwick District Council and not used by Coventry City Council. It is ideally located for the amenities of that city and for commuting.

Object

Representation ID: 3138

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr R.C Hadfield

This infringes the green belt further and could eventually lead to Coventry being joined to Kenilworth.

Comment

Representation ID: 3144

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: John Murphy

STRONGLY Object if reserved for Coventry allocation.

Support if taking a significant part of WDC allocation and assisting in spreading the WDC allocation across the whole district. This is a good site for development as it is adjacent to good infrastructure and has good access to the motorway network.

Object

Representation ID: 3198

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Robert Burtonshaw

No building on North Leamington Allotments

Object

Representation ID: 3218

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: mrs stella moore

This greenbelt should be retained at all costs or kenilworth will be swallowed up.

Support

Representation ID: 3259

Received: 20/09/2009

Respondent: Mr David John Bowers

As above 5 (ii)

Object

Representation ID: 3386

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs M Kane

Object

Comment

Representation ID: 3447

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr P Dimanbro

The need to reduce carbon footprints with more locally grown produce. Increasing fuel costs will cause foreign imports to become increasingly expensive.
I also live in Princes Drive, we have traffic jams 3 times a day. The proposed large extra housing and traffic will cause greater congestion and loss of productivity and greater pollution.

Object

Representation ID: 3472

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs E. Appleby

I do not agree. The area is designated of 'special landscape' with ancient woodland, a unique environment harbouring many different species of wildlife. To develop it would be vandalism.

Object

Representation ID: 3559

Received: 16/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Owen

object

Object

Representation ID: 3659

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Stephen Keay

This contains historic woodland and is useful farmland and should be retained as green belt South of Coventry. It will inevitably lead to the destructionof hedgerows, woodland and arable farmland.

Support

Representation ID: 3691

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Richard Brookes

Provides opportunity for local employment on the fringe of Coventry - equidistant from Coventry and Warwick Universities

Object

Representation ID: 3841

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Debbie Wiggins

Suggestions for the type of employment we should encourage included, high technology industries, service sector jobs, tourism, biotechnology and professional and financial/business services.

There is already enough available land for the above industries. The Ford foundary closed - so the thought of providing land for factories or light industry does not reflect the current situation.
Use up the land you have before assigning any more. I don't believe you should assign ANY MORE large chunks of land. Please inform your advisers that we have moved on since the industrial revolution.

Object

Representation ID: 3856

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Patricia Diane Freeman

The Kings Hill, south of Green Lane has old houses, a very old farm, as well as a pleasing outlook for walkers. The animal welfare and habitat for wildlife will be unrepairable for future generations.

Object

Representation ID: 3925

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

Must be better locations in Coventry boundaries . Need to keep Kenilworth town separate from Coventry.

Object

Representation ID: 3926

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Andrea Telford

Kenilworth needs help to boost trade free parking would help.

Support

Representation ID: 3945

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr John Archer

This site is an appropriate location as part of a balanced packege to meet future employment needs

Support

Representation ID: 3969

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Kim Matthews

This is the area most suited for both employment and housing development being adjacent to the city of Coventry.

Object

Representation ID: 4016

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Ms Angela Clarke

Destruction of Green Belt.

Object

Representation ID: 4028

Received: 24/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Diana Sellwood

I do not feel this land which provides green belt between Coventry and Kenilworth should be used for employment. Other land eg the disused Peugot site or land around Coventry airport should be considered.

Support

Representation ID: 4193

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Onkar Mann

Due to shortage of employment to the north of the district areas need to be allocated to the Kenilworth, North of Leamington and Warwick areas. These areas have relatively good access to the A46, A45/M45 and the M40. This would maximise use of existing infrastructure & mean less traffic having to go through Leamington & Warwick centres

Support

Representation ID: 4237

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: Kulwinder Fathers

No should be Kenilworth, Finham, Baginton Airport, North of Leamington/Warwick areas. This would reduce traffic in town centres and provide good access traffic from/to the A46, A45/M45 and the M40. There are already large areas of employment to the south of the district

Object

Representation ID: 4520

Received: 22/09/2009

Respondent: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

Location is in the Green Belt

Support

Representation ID: 4585

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: Mr S Morris

support

Object

Representation ID: 4659

Received: 23/09/2009

Respondent: V Gill Peppitt

Again is Kings Hill in Greenbelt? need for ' productive fields'!

Object

Representation ID: 4789

Received: 18/09/2009

Respondent: richard keylock

Object to development due to:
1. Over estimating demand for land type, numerous existing empty or undeveloped existing sites
2. Use of greenbelt land.
3. Lack of local infrastructure, and impact upon local existing infrastructure.
4. Highway safety and traffic generation.- insufficient existing transport access
5. No consultation with Coventry residents identifying site as a 'standby site'.
5. Loss of visual amenity and impact upon local quality of life.
6. Impact upon environment.
7. Availability of several other, more appropriate brownfield sites in Warwickshire.
8. Significant local opposition.

Object

Representation ID: 4847

Received: 25/09/2009

Respondent: David Pennycook

OBJECT----For all the reasons stated by the Finham Residents Assoc.