(iv) Land at Kings Hill, south of Green Lane, Finham

Support

Representation ID: 1222

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Andrew Horsley

Support

Object

Representation ID: 1225

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: MS Judith Bennett

This is green belt land and as such needs to be protected. I am still not convinced that the demand for housing and therefore employment will be there in 2026.

Support

Representation ID: 1292

Received: 24/08/2009

Respondent: Sarah Jane Horsley

Support

Object

Representation ID: 1348

Received: 25/08/2009

Respondent: Rod Pickering

- Proposed loss of green belt land (no longer regarded as sacrosanct?!)
-An excessive number of new dwellings
Traffic problems envisaged - poor infrastructure - loss of farming land - cross boundary overspill endangering areas of recognised biodiversity and both geographical and historical vaue - a lack of communication as well as known limitations to proposed sites etc

Support

Representation ID: 1360

Received: 18/08/2009

Respondent: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association

Agent: DNS Planning and Design Consultants

The authority needs to provide more available employment land.

Object

Representation ID: 1475

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Kundi

Number of people: 2

Object.

Object

Representation ID: 1590

Received: 31/08/2009

Respondent: Miss Melanie Turnbull

I obect to any building work on this beautiful land

Object

Representation ID: 1596

Received: 30/08/2009

Respondent: EUNICE NICOLSON

Strongly object -
Precious green belt land must be protected
Services, facilities, roads, infrastructure only just able to cope with current population

Support

Representation ID: 1612

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: William Bethell

This is one sensible option and to suggest this be reserved (your para 10.10) in the event that Coventry cannot find other areas for their expansion quite honestly, sucks! If to be used, it should be to meet Warwick District's needs not COVENTRY, in housing and employment.

Support

Representation ID: 1672

Received: 27/08/2009

Respondent: J.G Whetstone

Support.

Support

Representation ID: 1704

Received: 01/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni

There are opportunities to build the infrastructure to make developments fit for purpose.

Support

Representation ID: 1780

Received: 20/08/2009

Respondent: Max Bacon

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 1808

Received: 28/08/2009

Respondent: Val Hunnisett

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 1827

Received: 31/07/2009

Respondent: Mrs Helen Cheatham

Obviously it will take pressure off Warwick.

Support

Representation ID: 1928

Received: 03/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Andrew Ferguson

support

Object

Representation ID: 1974

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Ken Hope

(5.b.iv) If this list is in priority order then the King's Hill site should be nearer the top.

Object

Representation ID: 2042

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: mr john jacques

because it is based on biased unproven numbers provided by New Labour to suit own ends in getting relected, to get votes from mass of welfare dependent unemployed/unemployable hangers-on it has created in 11 years of mismanagement.

and this will overwhelm the quality o fthe existing ecology nearby, change the neighbourhood completely for residents,choke roads, swamp local facilities and is in conflict with stated views of residents.

Object

Representation ID: 2141

Received: 07/09/2009

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Filling in these green field spaces, decade by decade is creating a huge urban spread from Nuneaton in the north, across 30 miles, to Bishop's Tachbrook in the South.

Support

Representation ID: 2295

Received: 21/07/2009

Respondent: S B Hoyles

By far the best site for consideration is the land within the WDC area South of Coventry at Finham. Being close to that city where the existing infrastructure is well able to accommodate the influx. i.e. with respect to shops, transport, schools etc should be the preferred option.

Support

Representation ID: 2387

Received: 04/09/2009

Respondent: Roy Standley

Yes.

Support

Representation ID: 2424

Received: 08/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Connolly

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2519

Received: 10/09/2009

Respondent: Mr Terence Kemp

Objects to incremental urbanisation of land currently defining separate identities of Coventry and Kenilworth.

Object

Representation ID: 2595

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Richard Storey

Object.

Support

Representation ID: 2609

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: John Arnold

Support.

Object

Representation ID: 2638

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mr James Delaney

Gap between Kenilworth and Coventry to be maintained, to retain the local identity of both areas.
Any developments in this green area will encourage closure of the gap, a large part of the appeal to both areas residents.
Transport infrastructure in Kenilworth inadequate for any proximate developments (narrow roads, parking, etc).

Support

Representation ID: 2733

Received: 09/09/2009

Respondent: Pauline Neale

Yes, as close to transport links although not on greenfield sites.

Object

Representation ID: 2785

Received: 14/09/2009

Respondent: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

I reject any attempt to erode the Green Belt.

Object

Representation ID: 2820

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Tony Hyndman

Finham does not have the amenities to support such a large expansion on it's borders. Erosion of green belt land must not be allowed.

Object

Representation ID: 2905

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: ALISON ELFWOOD

THERE ARE NO JOBS IN THIS AREA, PEOPLE ARE MOVING OUT NOT IN. I KNOW PROFESSIONAL MEN WHO ARE SORTING BOXES AT THE AIRPORT BECAUSE IT'S ALL THEY CAN GET. WHERE ARE THE JOBS????

Comment

Representation ID: 2925

Received: 15/09/2009

Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Object if reserved for Coventry allocation.
Support if taking a significant part of WDC allocation and assisting in spreading the WDC allocation across the whole district. This is a good site for development as it is adjacent to good infrastructure and has good access to the motorway network.