Comment

Net Zero Carbon Development Plan Document - Regulation 19

Representation ID: 72197

Received: 08/06/2022

Respondent: Warwick District Labour Party

Representation Summary:

Option to upgrade completed building efficiency may be possible and preferable to a carbon offset payment; this should be made clear in the policy.

If it is necessary to include offsetting (which we do not favour) it must pass a stringent technical alternative test and NOT be permitted simply as an easier or cheaper option.

If a 9-year performance reassessment is required as suggested elsewhere, the same option - upgrade to original standard or costly carbon offset - should also be in the policy.

Will WDC set an example by committing not to seek carbon offset solutions to efficiency challenges?

Full text:

Option to upgrade completed building efficiency may be possible and preferable to a carbon offset payment; this should be made clear in the policy.

If it is necessary to include offsetting (which we do not favour) it must pass a stringent technical alternative test and NOT be permitted simply as an easier or cheaper option.

If a 9-year performance reassessment is required as suggested elsewhere, the same option - upgrade to original standard or costly carbon offset - should also be in the policy.

Will WDC set an example by committing not to seek carbon offset solutions to efficiency challenges?