1.3
It should be included and made clear in this paragraph that extensions to existing buildings are not to be charged.
Since only the ground space and roof space covered by the new development effects the need for access and additional water run off, it is arguable that it is unfair to charge for additional floors of living space.

1.4
2- 5 % of total development costs is a hefty fee, not a modest one, and a may encourage developers to cut corners on quality elsewhere. It will raise house prices even more, which are already high.
Is this to replace Section 106 planning obligation? Is so, it would be better to make that clear.
There should be no discrepancy between area with or without a Neighbourhood Plan. Areas without a Neighbourhood Plan are probably more in need than those with, therefore the funds allocated to the Local communities should all be at the higher rate of 25%.

1.5
The infrastructure should include rainwater harvesting and renewable energy specifically.

All references to the direct impact of development should take into account environmental sustainability specifically, not just landscaping and access roads. This is to be in accordance with
The Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive: Guidance for Planning Authorities
https://www.warwickdc.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/1105/chapter_3.pdf

Please set out full details of your objection or representation of support. If objecting, please set out what changes could be made to resolve your objection (Use a separate sheet if necessary).

2.2
The list of items of new or improved infrastructure does not include provision for rainwater collection or renewable energy. These are very real needs of buildings as they place increased burden on the power demands of a community and the additional pressure on the water resources, plus increased pressure of water run off on roofs and increased risk