Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 66602
Received: 25/06/2014
Respondent: Court (Warwick) Ltd
Agent: Stansgate Planning
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
As drafted, policy is unecessarily restrictive and inflexible and as a result the Plan will not deliver level of windfalls required. Plan therefore ineffective/unsound.
No sound justification for artificially limiting scale of development to 2 dwgs as proposed by criterion a). Larger infill and other small scale schemes should be capable of consideration on site-by-site basis without harm to character of village/Green Belt.
Stoneleigh not solely linear with examples of development behind main road frontages. Requirement in cirterion c) therefore inappropriate for Stoneleigh. Development could take place on land which does not front public hgihway without harming character of village/Green Belt
Criterion c) redundant in that impact of proposed development is to be considered under other Plan policies
see attached