Object

Publication Draft

Representation ID: 65391

Received: 26/06/2014

Respondent: Mr Nigel Hamilton

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

No new hotels should be allowed which would lead to a loss of diversity or capacity within existing visitor accommodation sector.
Replacing of one operator for another is not net economic growth for the district, it is the substitution effect. WDC should not hat smaller independent operators trend to spend more of their income on supplies and services from the district. Therefore in economic terms they are preferable to national/ international chains, due to their greater multiplier effect. Budget hotels do not enhance the tourism experience and therefore are not preferable in economic terms to independent or higher graded hotels.

Full text:

No new hotels should be allowed which would lead to a loss of diversity or capacity within existing visitor accommodation sector.
Replacing of one operator for another is not net economic growth for the district, it is the substitution effect. WDC should not hat smaller independent operators trend to spend more of their income on supplies and services from the district. Therefore in economic terms they are preferable to national/ international chains, due to their greater multiplier effect. Budget hotels do not enhance the tourism experience and therefore are not preferable in economic terms to independent or higher graded hotels.