Object
Preferred Options for Sites
Representation ID: 65300
Received: 21/04/2014
Respondent: Sarah Smith
There is great inconsistency in the commentary for some sites being deemed suitable and others unsuitable. For example: site GT19 being used by Caravan and Camping Club is presented as a positive factor but for GTalt22 it is noted that "As a Caravan and Camping Club site, this use would not be suitable".
Please could Council officers explain this?
To whom it may concern
Regarding the consultation on the Preferred Options Sites for Gypsies and Travellers, I refer you to my below comments:
8. Preferred Options for Consultation
PO1: Meeting the Requirement for Permanent Pitches - OBJECT
There is great inconsistency in the commentary for some sites being deemed suitable and others unsuitable.
For example:
GT19 - "Services available on site as currently used by Caravan and Camping Club " has been presented as a positive factor.
By comparison:
GTalt22 - "As a Caravan and Camping Club site, this use would not be suitable"
Please could Council officers explain this?
Please respond.