Object
Preferred Options for Sites
Representation ID: 64944
Received: 02/05/2014
Respondent: Barwood Strategic Land II Limited
Agent: HOW Planning LLP
Representation Summary:
The Council appears to have ignored its own sustainability Appraisal and evidence base: assessments for GT15 and GTalt01 identify more negative than positive effects and therefore allocating these as preferred site will result in unsustainable development. Similarly, GT02 has more positive than negative effects and would be a more sustainable form of development than GT15 or GTalt01 but is not a preferred site. GTalt03 also has more positive than negative effects and so should be removed from the Green Belt and promoted as a Preferred Site ie 'Green' rather than a Potentially Suitable Site ie 'Amber'.
Full text:
see attached