Object
Publication Draft
Representation ID: 64919
Received: 17/06/2014
Respondent: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
JPC believes the Plan and G&T Preferred Options fails to address adequately the best interests of both the settled and G&T communities.
Imposing G&T on mature communities and failure to incorporate them into larger strategic sites is flawed/neglectful, rendering this Plan unsound.
Furthermore the reluctance to address the Greenbelt in any imaginative way concentrates the G&T impact into an unrealistically small part of the WDC disregarding both existing residents' and G&T community wishes.
G&T provision should be properly planned on the strategic urban extension sites and the gateway area and only located elsewhere when there is explicit community and landowner support.
JPC believes the Plan andG&T Preferred Options fails to address adequately the best interests of both the settled and G&T communities.
Imposing G&T on mature communities and failure to incorporate them into larger strategic sites is flawed/neglectful, rendering this Plan UNSOUND.
Furthermore the reluctance to address the Greenbelt in any imaginative way concentrates the G&T impact into an unrealistically small part of the WDC disregarding both existing residents' and G&T community wishes.
G&T provision should be properly planned on the strategic urban extension sites and the gateway area and only located elsewhere when there is explicit community and landowner support.