Object
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
Representation ID: 56506
Received: 28/07/2013
Respondent: Mrs T Black
No evidence has been provided that the sites meet the criteria to be used to bring forward sites for Gypsies and Travellers as set out in the 'Sites for Gypsies and Travellers' document (June 2013). Therefore, this is not a fair, transparent or accessible consultation.
Site does not offer convenient access to a GP's surgery, school or public transport. Concerns about safe access to the road network given the additional trips and type of trips/movements that would be generated.
Policy B: Planning for Traveller Sites, para 11(f) of Planning Policy for Traveller sites (March 2012) required Local Planning Authorities to ensure traveller sites are sustainable economically, socially and environmentally and that undue pressure is not placed on local infrastructure and services. Warwickshire is experiencing a significant growth in pupil numbers and demand for places is currently outweighing availability. Changes have been made to avoid children from the Hatton Park development travelling considerable distance to school and more houses are planned for this area. Proposal will therefore place undue pressure on local infrastructure and services particularly local schools and the road network.
Dear Development Policy Manager or to whomever it may concern,
Ref. Proposed Gypsy & Traveller sites near Harbury (GT03, GT04)
I have been studying the proposal for the Local plan and draft policy for the criteria to assess traveller site suitability for Warwick District. The document provides a reasoned view and some direction on how the process will proceed.
I would however like to confirm my objection to the plans for the proposed sites near the Fosse Way and Harbury lane (GT03, GT04).
I regularly use this route and there are several compelling reasons why in my opinion the sites are not suitable. These include:
- Road safety. The crossroads at Harbury lane and the Fosse way is already a high risk junction for traffic accidents. Both roads are busy during the day, but especially so at peak hours. There are no paths and the thought of individuals and potentially children near these roads is of serious concern and will potentially raise risks further.
- There is limited access to a GP surgery, schools or public transport.
- The site is close to both Chesterton Windmill and the site of an old roman town. As important natural and historic features (photos are often taken facing west from the windmill) the sites would seem unsuitable.
In summary I do not believe these proposed sites are suitable as outlined above and I object to these sites on this basis.
I would appreciate it if could confirm receipt of this email and my objection. Many thanks.